Structured Training for Neural Network Transition-Based Parsing

11984

Authors

nan

Abstract

We present structured perceptron training for neural network transition-based dependency parsing. We learn the neural network representation using a gold corpus augmented by a large number of automat- ically parsed sentences. Given this fixed network representation, we learn a final layer using the struc- tured perceptron with beam-search decoding. On the Penn Treebank, our parser reaches 94.26% un- labeled and 92.41% labeled attachment accuracy, which to our knowledge is the best accuracy on Stanford Dependencies to date. We also provide in- depth ablative analysis to determine which aspects of our model provide the largest gains in accuracy. 1

Keywords

nan

Full Content

Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 323–333, Beijing, China, July 26-31, 2015. c⃝2015 Association for Computational Linguistics Structured Training for Neural Network Transition-Based Parsing David Weiss Chris Alberti Michael Collins Slav Petrov Google Inc New York, NY {djweiss,chrisalberti,mjcollins,slav}@google.com Abstract We present structured perceptron training for neural network transition-based dependency parsing. We learn the neural network representation using a gold corpus augmented by a large number of automat- ically parsed sentences. Given this fixed network representation, we learn a final layer using the struc- tured perceptron with beam-search decoding. On the Penn Treebank, our parser reaches 94.26% un- labeled and 92.41% labeled attachment accuracy, which to our knowledge is the best accuracy on Stanford Dependencies to date. We also provide in- depth ablative analysis to determine which aspects of our model provide the largest gains in accuracy. 1 Introduction Syntactic analysis is a central problem in lan- guage understanding that has received a tremen- dous amount of attention. Lately, dependency parsing has emerged as a popular approach to this problem due to the availability of dependency tree- banks in many languages (Buchholz and Marsi, 2006; Nivre et al., 2007; McDonald et al., 2013) and the efficiency of dependency parsers. Transition-based parsers (Nivre, 2008) have been shown to provide a good balance between efficiency and accuracy. In transition-based pars- ing, sentences are processed in a linear left to right pass; at each position, the parser needs to choose from a set of possible actions defined by the transition strategy. In greedy models, a classi- fier is used to independently decide which transi- tion to take based on local features of the current parse configuration. This classifier typically uses hand-engineered features and is trained on indi- vidual transitions extracted from the gold transi- tion sequence. While extremely fast, these greedy models typically suffer from search errors due to the inability to recover from incorrect decisions. Zhang and Clark (2008) showed that a beam- search decoding algorithm utilizing the structured perceptron training algorithm can greatly improve accuracy. Nonetheless, significant manual fea- ture engineering was required before transition- based systems provided competitive accuracy with graph-based parsers (Zhang and Nivre, 2011), and only by incorporating graph-based scoring func- tions were Bohnet and Kuhn (2012) able to exceed the accuracy of graph-based approaches. In contrast to these carefully hand-tuned ap- proaches, Chen and Manning (2014) recently presented a neural network version of a greedy transition-based parser. In their model, a feed- forward neural network with a hidden layer is used to make the transition decisions. The hidden layer has the power to learn arbitrary combinations of the atomic inputs, thereby eliminating the need for hand-engineered features. Furthermore, because the neural network uses a distributed representa- tion, it is able to model lexical, part-of-speech (POS) tag, and arc label similarities in a contin- uous space. However, although their model out- performs its greedy hand-engineered counterparts, it is not competitive with state-of-the-art …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

We present structured perceptron training for neural network transition-based dependency parsing. We learn the neural network representation using a gold corpus augmented by a large number of automatically parsed sentences. Given this fixed network representation, we learn a final layer using the structured perceptron with beam-search decoding. On the Penn Treebank, our parser reaches 94.26% unlabeled and 92.41% labeled attachment accuracy, which to our knowledge is the best accuracy on Stanford Dependencies to date. We also provide indepth ablative analysis to determine which aspects of our model provide the largest gains in accuracy. 1

Publication Details

Paper ID:
11984
Year:
2015
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan