Domain-specific vs. Uniform Modeling for Coreference Resolution

13339

Authors

nan

Abstract

AbstractSeveral corpora annotated for coreference have been made available in the past decade. These resources differ with respect to their size and the underlying structure: the number of domains and their similarity. Our study compares domain-specific models, learned from small heterogeneous subsets of the investigated corpora, against uniform models, that utilize all the available data. We show that for knowledge-poor baseline systems, domain-specific and uniform modeling yield same results. Systems, relying on large amounts of linguistic knowledge, however, exhibit differences in their performance: with all the designed features in use, domain-specific models suffer from over-fitting, whereas with pre-selected feature sets they tend to outperform union models.

Keywords

nan

Full Content

nan

Labeled Text

AbstractSeveral corpora annotated for coreference have been made available in the past decade. These resources differ with respect to their size and the underlying structure: the number of domains and their similarity. Our study compares domain-specific models, learned from small heterogeneous subsets of the investigated corpora, against uniform models, that utilize all the available data. We show that for knowledge-poor baseline systems, domain-specific and uniform modeling yield same results. Systems, relying on large amounts of linguistic knowledge, however, exhibit differences in their performance: with all the designed features in use, domain-specific models suffer from over-fitting, whereas with pre-selected feature sets they tend to outperform union models.

Publication Details

Paper ID:
13339
Year:
2012
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan