“Don’t discuss”: Investigating Semantic and Argumentative Features for Supervised Propagandist Message Detection and Classification

20175

Authors

nan

Abstract

AbstractOne of the mechanisms through which disinformation is spreading online, in particular through social media, is by employing propaganda techniques. These include specific rhetorical and psychological strategies, ranging from leveraging on emotions to exploiting logical fallacies. In this paper, our goal is to push forward research on propaganda detection based on text analysis, given the crucial role these methods may play to address this main societal issue. More precisely, we propose a supervised approach to classify textual snippets both as propaganda messages and according to the precise applied propaganda technique, as well as a detailed linguistic analysis of the features characterising propaganda information in text (e.g., semantic, sentiment and argumentation features). Extensive experiments conducted on two available propagandist resources (i.e., NLP4IF’19 and SemEval’20-Task 11 datasets) show that the proposed approach, leveraging different language models and the investigated linguistic features, achieves very promising results on propaganda classification, both at sentence- and at fragment-level.

Keywords

nan

Full Content

Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, pages 1498–1507 Sep 1–3, 2021. https://doi.org/10.26615/978-954-452-072-4_168 1498 “Don’t discuss”: Investigating Semantic and Argumentative Features for Supervised Propagandist Message Detection and Classification Vorakit Vorakitphan, Elena Cabrio, Serena Villata Universit´e Cˆote d’Azur, Inria, CNRS, I3S, France vorakit.vorakitphan@inria.fr, elena.cabrio@univ-cotedazur.fr, villata@i3s.unice.fr Abstract One of the mechanisms through which dis- information is spreading online, in particular through social media, is by employing pro- paganda techniques. These include specific rhetorical and psychological strategies, rang- ing from leveraging on emotions to exploit- ing logical fallacies. In this paper, our goal is to push forward research on propaganda de- tection based on text analysis, given the cru- cial role these methods may play to address this main societal issue. More precisely, we propose a supervised approach to classify tex- tual snippets both as propaganda messages and according to the precise applied propa- ganda technique, as well as a detailed linguis- tic analysis of the features characterising pro- paganda information in text (e.g., semantic, sentiment and argumentation features). Ex- tensive experiments conducted on two avail- able propagandist resources (i.e., NLP4IF’19 and SemEval’20-Task 11 datasets) show that the proposed approach, leveraging different language models and the investigated linguis- tic features, achieves very promising results on propaganda classification, both at sentence- and at fragment-level. 1 Introduction Propaganda represents an effective, even though of- ten misleading, communication strategy to promote a cause or a viewpoint, for instance in the political context (Lasswell, 1938; Koppang, 2009; Dillard and Pfau, 2009; Longpre et al., 2019). Different communication means can be used to disseminate propaganda, i.e., textual documents, images, videos and oral speeches. The ability to effectively iden- tify and manifestly label such kind of misleading and potentially harmful content is of primarily im- portance to restrain the spread of such information to avoid detrimental consequences for the society. In this paper, we tackle this challenging is- sue (Da San Martino et al., 2020b) by proposing a textual propaganda detection model. More pre- cisely, we address the following research questions: (i) how to automatically identify propaganda in tex- tual documents and further classify them into fine- grained categories?, and (ii) what are the linguistic distinctive features of propaganda text snippets? The contribution of this paper consists not only in proposing a new effective neural architecture to au- tomatically identify and classify propaganda in text, but we also present a detailed linguistic analysis of the features characterising propaganda messages. Our work focuses on the propaganda detection and classification task, casting it both as a binary and as a multi-class classification task, and we ad- dress it both at sentence-level and at fragment-level. We investigate different architectures of recent lan- guage models (i.e., BERT, RoBERTa), combining them with a rich set of linguistic features ranging from sentiment and emotion to argumentation fea- tures, to rhetorical stylistic ones. The extensive experiments we conducted on two standard bench- marks (i.e., the NLP4IF’19 and SemEval’20-Task 11 datasets) show that the proposed architectures achieve satisfying results, outperforming state-of- the-art systems on most of …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

AbstractOne of the mechanisms through which disinformation is spreading online, in particular through social media, is by employing propaganda techniques. These include specific rhetorical and psychological strategies, ranging from leveraging on emotions to exploiting logical fallacies. In this paper, our goal is to push forward research on propaganda detection based on text analysis, given the crucial role these methods may play to address this main societal issue. More precisely, we propose a supervised approach to classify textual snippets both as propaganda messages and according to the precise applied propaganda technique, as well as a detailed linguistic analysis of the features characterising propaganda information in text (e.g., semantic, sentiment and argumentation features). Extensive experiments conducted on two available propagandist resources (i.e., NLP4IF’19 and SemEval’20-Task 11 datasets) show that the proposed approach, leveraging different language models and the investigated linguistic features, achieves very promising results on propaganda classification, both at sentence- and at fragment-level.

Publication Details

Paper ID:
20175
Year:
2021
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan