On the Use of External Data for Spoken Named Entity Recognition

21452

Authors

nan

Abstract

AbstractSpoken language understanding (SLU) tasks involve mapping from speech signals to semantic labels. Given the complexity of such tasks, good performance is expected to require large labeled datasets, which are difficult to collect for each new task and domain. However, recent advances in self-supervised speech representations have made it feasible to consider learning SLU models with limited labeled data. In this work, we focus on low-resource spoken named entity recognition (NER) and address the question: Beyond self-supervised pre-training, how can we use external speech and/or text data that are not annotated for the task? We consider self-training, knowledge distillation, and transfer learning for end-to-end (E2E) and pipeline (speech recognition followed by text NER) approaches. We find that several of these approaches improve performance in resource-constrained settings beyond the benefits from pre-trained representations. Compared to prior work, we find relative improvements in F1 of up to 16%. While the best baseline model is a pipeline approach, the best performance using external data is ultimately achieved by an E2E model. We provide detailed comparisons and analyses, developing insights on, for example, the effects of leveraging external data on (i) different categories of NER errors and (ii) the switch in performance trends between pipeline and E2E models.

Keywords

nan

Full Content

Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 724 - 737 July 10-15, 2022 ©2022 Association for Computational Linguistics On the Use of External Data for Spoken Named Entity Recognition Ankita Pasad∗ 2, Felix Wu1, Suwon Shon1, Karen Livescu2, Kyu J. Han1 1ASAPP 2Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago Abstract Spoken language understanding (SLU) tasks involve mapping from speech signals to se- mantic labels. Given the complexity of such tasks, good performance is expected to re- quire large labeled datasets, which are diffi- cult to collect for each new task and domain. However, recent advances in self-supervised speech representations have made it feasible to consider learning SLU models with lim- ited labeled data. In this work, we focus on low-resource spoken named entity recognition (NER) and address the question: Beyond self- supervised pre-training, how can we use exter- nal speech and/or text data that are not anno- tated for the task? We consider self-training, knowledge distillation, and transfer learning for end-to-end (E2E) and pipeline (speech recognition followed by text NER) approaches. We find that several of these approaches im- prove performance in resource-constrained set- tings beyond the benefits from pre-trained rep- resentations. Compared to prior work, we find relative improvements in F1 of up to 16%. While the best baseline model is a pipeline approach, the best performance using external data is ultimately achieved by an E2E model. We provide detailed comparisons and analyses, developing insights on, for example, the ef- fects of leveraging external data on (i) different categories of NER errors and (ii) the switch in performance trends between pipeline and E2E models. 1 Introduction Named entity recognition (NER) is a popular task in natural language processing. It involves detect- ing the named entities and their categories from a text sequence. NER can be used to extract infor- mation from unstructured data, which can also be used as features for other tasks like question an- swering (Chen et al., 2017) and slot filling for task- oriented dialogues (Louvan and Magnini, 2018). ∗Work done during an internship at ASAPP. Baseline + External unlabeled speech + External unlabeled text + External transcribed speech 60 70 80 90 F1 (%) 72.0 68.1 74.977.0 73.171.3 77.679.6 86.0 Pipeline E2E Text NER Figure 1: Improvements in spoken NER with 100 hours of external data of different types. “Pipeline” refers to approaches consisting of speech recognition followed by a text NER model; “E2E” refers to approaches that directly map from speech to NER-tagged text. The “Baseline” and “Text NER” numbers are from previ- ously established baselines (Shon et al., 2022). Thanks to pre-trained text representations such as BERT (Devlin et al., 2019), text-based NER has recently improved greatly (Wang et al., 2021b; Li et al., 2020b). Spoken NER, on the other hand, is not as well-studied. It has the added challenges of continuous-valued and longer input sequences and, at the same time, provides opportunities to take advantage of acoustic cues in the input. …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

AbstractSpoken language understanding (SLU) tasks involve mapping from speech signals to semantic labels. Given the complexity of such tasks, good performance is expected to require large labeled datasets, which are difficult to collect for each new task and domain. However, recent advances in self-supervised speech representations have made it feasible to consider learning SLU models with limited labeled data. In this work, we focus on low-resource spoken named entity recognition (NER) and address the question: Beyond self-supervised pre-training, how can we use external speech and/or text data that are not annotated for the task? We consider self-training, knowledge distillation, and transfer learning for end-to-end (E2E) and pipeline (speech recognition followed by text NER) approaches. We find that several of these approaches improve performance in resource-constrained settings beyond the benefits from pre-trained representations. Compared to prior work, we find relative improvements in F1 of up to 16%. While the best baseline model is a pipeline approach, the best performance using external data is ultimately achieved by an E2E model. We provide detailed comparisons and analyses, developing insights on, for example, the effects of leveraging external data on (i) different categories of NER errors and (ii) the switch in performance trends between pipeline and E2E models.

Publication Details

Paper ID:
21452
Year:
2022
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan