Quality Estimation for Image Captions Based on Large-scale Human Evaluations
21626Authors
nan
Abstract
AbstractAutomatic image captioning has improved significantly over the last few years, but the problem is far from being solved, with state of the art models still often producing low quality captions when used in the wild. In this paper, we focus on the task of Quality Estimation (QE) for image captions, which attempts to model the caption quality from a human perspective and *without* access to ground-truth references, so that it can be applied at prediction time to detect low-quality captions produced on *previously unseen images*. For this task, we develop a human evaluation process that collects coarse-grained caption annotations from crowdsourced users, which is then used to collect a large scale dataset spanning more than 600k caption quality ratings. We then carefully validate the quality of the collected ratings and establish baseline models for this new QE task. Finally, we further collect fine-grained caption quality annotations from trained raters, and use them to demonstrate that QE models trained over the coarse ratings can effectively detect and filter out low-quality image captions, thereby improving the user experience from captioning systems.
Keywords
Full Content
Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 3157–3166 June 6–11, 2021. ©2021 Association for Computational Linguistics 3157 Quality Estimation for Image Captions Based on Large-scale Human Evaluations Tomer Levinboim Ashish V. Thapliyal Piyush Sharma Radu Soricut Google Research Venice, CA 90291 {tomerl,asht,piyushsharma,rsoricut}@google.com Abstract Automatic image captioning has improved sig- nificantly over the last few years, but the prob- lem is far from being solved, with state of the art models still often producing low qual- ity captions when used in the wild. In this paper, we focus on the task of Quality Es- timation (QE) for image captions, which at- tempts to model the caption quality from a hu- man perspective and without access to ground- truth references, so that it can be applied at prediction time to detect low-quality captions produced on previously unseen images. For this task, we develop a human evaluation pro- cess that collects coarse-grained caption anno- tations from crowdsourced users, which is then used to collect a large scale dataset spanning more than 600k caption quality ratings. We then carefully validate the quality of the col- lected ratings and establish baseline models for this new QE task. Finally, we further col- lect fine-grained caption quality annotations from trained raters, and use them to demon- strate that QE models trained over the coarse ratings can effectively detect and filter out low- quality image captions, thereby improving the user experience from captioning systems. 1 Introduction Image captioning technology produces automatic image descriptions using natural language with the goal of being consumed by end-users that may not be able to directly access the images. This need arises either because the user has a permanent con- dition (accessibility for visually impaired people), or due to a temporary situation where the user can- not use the visual modality (such as limited band- width, or smart voice-assistant). In any of these situations, exposing the end-users to a generated caption that is incorrect negatively impacts user- trust, as it can have undesirable consequences for how they act next (for example, how they comment on a social-media site based on their misguided understanding). In this paper, we propose to mitigate such risks through Quality Estimation (QE) of image captions. That is, we propose to automatically compute a quality estimation score QE(image, caption) for a generated caption, and use it to control the quality of the captions presented to the user. For example, by filtering out captions with a low QE score (below a carefully chosen threshold), only high scoring captions would be served thereby minimizing the risks associated with low-quality captions. We emphasize two aspects of QE that have guided us in our design choices: First, the QE task is distinct from the model selection task: model selection measures output similarity to a fixed, ground-truth annotated dataset during training time (with traditional offline solutions such as CIDEr and SPICE). In contrast, a QE model estimates the caption quality with respect …
Content truncated to 500 words
Labeled Text
AbstractAutomatic image captioning has improved significantly over the last few years, but the problem is far from being solved, with state of the art models still often producing low quality captions when used in the wild. In this paper, we focus on the task of Quality Estimation (QE) for image captions, which attempts to model the caption quality from a human perspective and *without* access to ground-truth references, so that it can be applied at prediction time to detect low-quality captions produced on *previously unseen images*. For this task, we develop a human evaluation process that collects coarse-grained caption annotations from crowdsourced users, which is then used to collect a large scale dataset spanning more than 600k caption quality ratings. We then carefully validate the quality of the collected ratings and establish baseline models for this new QE task. Finally, we further collect fine-grained caption quality annotations from trained raters, and use them to demonstrate that QE models trained over the coarse ratings can effectively detect and filter out low-quality image captions, thereby improving the user experience from captioning systems.
Publication Details
- Paper ID:
- 21626
- Year:
- 2021
- Publication:
- TIPSTER
- Publication Type:
- conf
- DOI:
- nan