A large-scale study of the effects of word frequency and predictability in naturalistic reading
21879Authors
nan
Abstract
AbstractA number of psycholinguistic studies have factorially manipulated words’ contextual predictabilities and corpus frequencies and shown separable effects of each on measures of human sentence processing, a pattern which has been used to support distinct mechanisms underlying prediction on the one hand and lexical retrieval on the other. This paper examines the generalizability of this finding to more realistic conditions of sentence processing by studying effects of frequency and predictability in three large-scale naturalistic reading corpora. Results show significant effects of word frequency and predictability in isolation but no effect of frequency over and above predictability, and thus do not provide evidence of distinct mechanisms. The non-replication of separable effects in a naturalistic setting raises doubts about the existence of such a distinction in everyday sentence comprehension. Instead, these results are consistent with previous claims that apparent effects of frequency are underlyingly effects of predictability.
Keywords
Full Content
Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2019, pages 4086–4094 Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 2 - June 7, 2019. c⃝2019 Association for Computational Linguistics 4086 A Large-Scale Study of the Effects of Word Frequency and Predictability in Naturalistic Reading Cory Shain Department of Linguistics The Ohio State University shain.3@osu.edu Abstract A number of psycholinguistic studies have fac- torially manipulated words’ contextual pre- dictabilities and corpus frequencies and shown separable effects of each on measures of hu- man sentence processing, a pattern which has been used to support distinct mechanisms un- derlying prediction on the one hand and lex- ical retrieval on the other. This paper exam- ines the generalizability of this finding to more realistic conditions of sentence processing by studying effects of frequency and predictabil- ity in three large-scale naturalistic reading cor- pora. Results show significant effects of word frequency and predictability in isolation but no effect of frequency over and above predictabil- ity, and thus do not provide evidence of dis- tinct mechanisms. The non-replication of sep- arable effects in a naturalistic setting raises doubts about the existence of such a distinc- tion in everyday sentence comprehension. In- stead, these results are consistent with previ- ous claims that apparent effects of frequency are underlyingly effects of predictability. 1 Introduction Are there distinct effects of a word’s frequency versus predictability in human sentence compre- hension? Recent evidence implicates prediction as a major organizing principle in cognition (Bubic et al., 2010; Singer et al., 2018; Keller and Mrsic- Flogel, 2018), and psycholinguists have long stud- ied the role of prediction in human sentence pro- cessing and its relation to other comprehension mechanisms (Marslen-Wilson, 1975; Kutas and Hillyard, 1984; MacDonald et al., 1994; Tanen- haus et al., 1995; Hale, 2001; Norris, 2006; Levy, 2008; Frank and Bod, 2011). Some prominent theories of word recognition claim that ease of lexical access is modulated by the strength of a word’s representation in memory, independently of contextual factors that guide prediction (Seiden- berg and McClelland, 1989; Coltheart et al., 2001; Harm and Seidenberg, 2004). Other theories hold that apparent effects of frequency are underlyingly effects of predictability (Norris, 2006; Levy, 2008; Rasmussen and Schuler, 2018). A number of studies using constructed stim- uli that factorially manipulate word frequency and predictability have found separable additive ef- fects of each, suggesting distinct influences on lexical processing (see Staub, 2015 for a re- view). This paper examines the generalizability of these findings to typical sentence comprehension by searching for separable effects of frequency and n-gram predictability using deconvolutional time series regression (DTSR) models (Shain and Schuler, 2018) fitted to three large naturalistic reading corpora: Natural Stories (Futrell et al., 2018), Dundee (Kennedy et al., 2003), and UCL (Frank et al., 2013). While results show evidence of both frequency and predictability effects in iso- lation, they show no effect of frequency over pre- dictability and thus do not support the existence of separable effects. They are instead consistent with either (1) an account of apparent frequency effects as epiphenomena of predictive processing (Norris, …
Content truncated to 500 words
Labeled Text
AbstractA number of psycholinguistic studies have factorially manipulated words’ contextual predictabilities and corpus frequencies and shown separable effects of each on measures of human sentence processing, a pattern which has been used to support distinct mechanisms underlying prediction on the one hand and lexical retrieval on the other. This paper examines the generalizability of this finding to more realistic conditions of sentence processing by studying effects of frequency and predictability in three large-scale naturalistic reading corpora. Results show significant effects of word frequency and predictability in isolation but no effect of frequency over and above predictability, and thus do not provide evidence of distinct mechanisms. The non-replication of separable effects in a naturalistic setting raises doubts about the existence of such a distinction in everyday sentence comprehension. Instead, these results are consistent with previous claims that apparent effects of frequency are underlyingly effects of predictability.
Publication Details
- Paper ID:
- 21879
- Year:
- 2019
- Publication:
- TIPSTER
- Publication Type:
- conf
- DOI:
- nan