CGoDial: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Chinese Goal-oriented Dialog Evaluation
31045Authors
nan
Abstract
AbstractPractical dialog systems need to deal with various knowledge sources, noisy user expressions, and the shortage of annotated data. To better solve the above problems, we propose CGoDial, a new challenging and comprehensive Chinese benchmark for multi-domain Goal-oriented Dialog evaluation. It contains 96,763 dialog sessions, and 574,949 dialog turns totally, covering three datasets with different knowledge sources: 1) a slot-based dialog (SBD) dataset with table-formed knowledge, 2) a flow-based dialog (FBD) dataset with tree-formed knowledge, and a retrieval-based dialog (RBD) dataset with candidate-formed knowledge. To bridge the gap between academic benchmarks and spoken dialog scenarios, we either collect data from real conversations or add spoken features to existing datasets via crowd-sourcing. The proposed experimental settings include the combinations of training with either the entire training set or a few-shot training set, and testing with either the standard test set or a hard test subset, which can assess model capabilities in terms of general prediction, fast adaptability and reliable robustness.
Keywords
Full Content
Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 4097 - 4111 December 7-11, 2022 ©2022 Association for Computational Linguistics CGoDial: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Chinese Goal-oriented Dialog Evaluation Yinpei Dai, Wanwei He, Bowen Li, Yuchuan Wu, Zheng Cao, Zhongqi An, Jian Sun, Yongbin Li∗ Alibaba Group, Beijing, China {yinpei.dyp,hewanwei.hww,shengxiu.wyc,zhengzhi.cz, zhongqi.azq,jian.sun,shuide.lyb}@alibaba-inc.com Abstract Practical dialog systems need to deal with var- ious knowledge sources, noisy user expres- sions, and the shortage of annotated data. To better solve the above problems, we propose CGoDial1, a new challenging and compre- hensive Chinese benchmark for multi-domain Goal-oriented Dialog evaluation. It contains 96,763 dialog sessions, and 574,949 dialog turns totally, covering three datasets with differ- ent knowledge sources: 1) a slot-based dialog (SBD) dataset with table-formed knowledge, 2) a flow-based dialog (FBD) dataset with tree- formed knowledge, and a retrieval-based dialog (RBD) dataset with candidate-formed knowl- edge. To bridge the gap between academic benchmarks and spoken dialog scenarios, we ei- ther collect data from real conversations or add spoken features to existing datasets via crowd- sourcing. The proposed experimental settings include the combinations of training with either the entire training set or a few-shot training set, and testing with either the standard test set or a hard test subset, which can assess model ca- pabilities in terms of general prediction, fast adaptability and reliable robustness. 1 Introduction Goal-oriented dialog systems converse with users naturally, helping them fulfill specific goals such as restaurant booking, hotel reservation, and flight search. Many popular datasets have been intro- duced to facilitate the dialog research, ranging from simple single-domain (Wen et al., 2017) to more difficult multi-domain dialogs (Budzianowski et al., 2018). Similar to the widely studied GLUE (Wang et al., 2019b) and SuperGLUE (Wang et al., 2019a) for general natural language understanding, large- scale benchmarks have been specifically designed for dialog systems. For instance, Mehri et al. (2020) ∗Corresponding author 1Dataset available at https://github.com/Alibaba Research/DAMO-ConvAI/cgodial. proposed the DialoGLUE, a collection of seven popular English dialog datasets, to assess the natu- ral language understanding ability in a few-shot set- ting. More recently, Peng et al. (2021b) introduced the RADDLE, another large-scale benchmark that includes a diagnostic checklist facilitating detailed robustness analysis for pre-trained language mod- els (Radford et al.; Peng et al., 2021a). However, compared to the abundance of English dialog benchmarks, the resource of Chinese dialog datasets in goal-oriented dialog remains quite lim- ited, let alone the large-scale benchmark suitable for the dialog evaluation of Chinese pre-trained lan- guage models. Moreover, current Chinese dialog datasets, such as CrossWOZ (Zhu et al., 2020) and RiSAWOZ (Quan et al., 2020), mainly focus on the schema-guided dialog as in the classical Multi- WOZ dataset (Budzianowski et al., 2018), where conversations are grounded on a table-formed on- tology. This kind of ontology usually defines a set of possible slot-value pairs to be recognized during the dialog for database query (Young et al., 2013). In real-world applications, however, more types of goal-oriented dialogs are involved. For instance, in Xie et …
Content truncated to 500 words
Labeled Text
AbstractPractical dialog systems need to deal with various knowledge sources, noisy user expressions, and the shortage of annotated data. To better solve the above problems, we propose CGoDial, a new challenging and comprehensive Chinese benchmark for multi-domain Goal-oriented Dialog evaluation. It contains 96,763 dialog sessions, and 574,949 dialog turns totally, covering three datasets with different knowledge sources: 1) a slot-based dialog (SBD) dataset with table-formed knowledge, 2) a flow-based dialog (FBD) dataset with tree-formed knowledge, and a retrieval-based dialog (RBD) dataset with candidate-formed knowledge. To bridge the gap between academic benchmarks and spoken dialog scenarios, we either collect data from real conversations or add spoken features to existing datasets via crowd-sourcing. The proposed experimental settings include the combinations of training with either the entire training set or a few-shot training set, and testing with either the standard test set or a hard test subset, which can assess model capabilities in terms of general prediction, fast adaptability and reliable robustness.
Publication Details
- Paper ID:
- 31045
- Year:
- 2022
- Publication:
- TIPSTER
- Publication Type:
- conf
- DOI:
- nan