Discourse Entities in Janus
35836Authors
nan
Abstract
This paper addresses issues that arose in apply- ing the model for discourse entity (DE) generation in B. Webber's work (1978, 1983) to an interactive multi- modal interface. Her treatment was extended in 4 areas: (1)the notion of context dependence of DEs was formalized in an intensional logic, (2)the treat- ment of DEs for indefinite NPs was modified to use skolem functions, (3)the treatment of dependent quantifiers was generalized, and (4) DEs originating from non-linguistic sources, such as pointing actions, were taken into account. The discourse entities are used in intra- and extra-sentential pronoun resolution in BBN Janus. 1
Keywords
Full Content
DISCOURSE ENTITIES IN JANUS Damaris M. Ayuso BBN Systems and Technologies Corporation 10 Moulton Street Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 dayuso@bbn.com Abstract This paper addresses issues that arose in apply- ing the model for discourse entity (DE) generation in B. Webber's work (1978, 1983) to an interactive multi- modal interface. Her treatment was extended in 4 areas: (1)the notion of context dependence of DEs was formalized in an intensional logic, (2)the treat- ment of DEs for indefinite NPs was modified to use skolem functions, (3)the treatment of dependent quantifiers was generalized, and (4) DEs originating from non-linguistic sources, such as pointing actions, were taken into account. The discourse entities are used in intra- and extra-sentential pronoun resolution in BBN Janus. 1 Introduction Discourse entities (DEs) are descriptions of ob- jects, groups of objects, events, etc. from the real world or from hypothesized or possible worlds that are evoked in a discourse. Any communicative act, be it spoken, written, gestured, or system-initiated, can give rise to DEs. As a discourse progresses, an ade- quate discourse model must represent the relevant entities, and the relationships between them (Grosz and Sidner, 1986), A speaker may then felicitously refer anaphorically to an object (subject to focusing or centering constraints (Grosz et al., 1983, Sidner 1981, 1983, Brennan et al. 1987) ) if there is an existing DE representing it, or if a corresponding DE may be directly inferred from an existing DE. For example, the utterance "Every senior in Milford High School has a car" gives rise to at least 3 entities, describable in English as "the seniors in Milford High School", "Milford High School", and "the set of cars each of which is owned by some senior in Milford High School". These entities may then be accessed by the following next utterances, respectively: "They graduate in June." "It's a good school." "They completely fill the parking lot." Webber (1978, 1983) addressed the question of determining what discourse entities are introduced by a text. She defined rules which produce "initial descriptions" (IDs) of new entities stemming from noun phrases, given a meaning representation of a text. An ID is a logical expression that denotes the corresponding object and uses only information from the text's meaning representation. The declarative nature of Webber's rules and the fact that they relied solely on the structure of the meaning representation, made her approach well suited for implementation. The present work recasts her rules in Janus's in- tensional logic framework (described in section 2). Two goals guided our approach: (1)that our DE representations be semantically clear and correct ac- cording to the formal definitions of our language, and (2) that these representations be amenable to the processing required in an interactive environment such as ours, where each reference needs to be fully resolved against the current context. In the following sections, we first present the representational requirements for this approach, and introduce our logical language (section 2). Then we discuss issues that arose in trying to formalize the logical representation of …
Content truncated to 500 words
Labeled Text
This paper addresses issues that arose in apply- ing the model for discourse entity (DE) generation in B. Webber's work (1978, 1983) to an interactive multi- modal interface. Her treatment was extended in 4 areas: (1)the notion of context dependence of DEs was formalized in an intensional logic, (2)the treat- ment of DEs for indefinite NPs was modified to use skolem functions, (3)the treatment of dependent quantifiers was generalized, and (4) DEs originating from non-linguistic sources, such as pointing actions, were taken into account. The discourse entities are used in intra- and extra-sentential pronoun resolution in BBN Janus. 1
Publication Details
- Paper ID:
- 35836
- Year:
- 1989
- Publication:
- TIPSTER
- Publication Type:
- conf
- DOI:
- nan