A Pilot Study of Opinion Summarization in Conversations
36397Authors
nan
Abstract
This paper presents a pilot study of opinion summarization on conversations. We create a corpus containing extractive and abstrac- tive summaries of speaker’s opinion towards a given topic using 88 telephone conversa- tions. We adopt two methods to perform ex- tractive summarization. The first one is a sentence-ranking method that linearly com- bines scores measured from different aspects including topic relevance, subjectivity, and sentence importance. The second one is a graph-based method, which incorporates topic and sentiment information, as well as addi- tional information about sentence-to-sentence relations extracted based on dialogue struc- ture. Our evaluation results show that both methods significantly outperform the baseline approach that extracts the longest utterances. In particular, we find that incorporating di- alogue structure in the graph-based method contributes to the improved system perfor- mance. 1
Keywords
Full Content
Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 331–339, Portland, Oregon, June 19-24, 2011. c⃝2011 Association for Computational Linguistics A Pilot Study of Opinion Summarization in Conversations Dong Wang Yang Liu The University of Texas at Dallas dongwang,yangl@hlt.utdallas.edu Abstract This paper presents a pilot study of opinion summarization on conversations. We create a corpus containing extractive and abstrac- tive summaries of speaker’s opinion towards a given topic using 88 telephone conversa- tions. We adopt two methods to perform ex- tractive summarization. The first one is a sentence-ranking method that linearly com- bines scores measured from different aspects including topic relevance, subjectivity, and sentence importance. The second one is a graph-based method, which incorporates topic and sentiment information, as well as addi- tional information about sentence-to-sentence relations extracted based on dialogue struc- ture. Our evaluation results show that both methods significantly outperform the baseline approach that extracts the longest utterances. In particular, we find that incorporating di- alogue structure in the graph-based method contributes to the improved system perfor- mance. 1 Introduction Both sentiment analysis (opinion recognition) and summarization have been well studied in recent years in the natural language processing (NLP) com- munity. Most of the previous work on sentiment analysis has been conducted on reviews. Summa- rization has been applied to different genres, such as news articles, scientific articles, and speech do- mains including broadcast news, meetings, conver- sations and lectures. However, opinion summariza- tion has not been explored much. This can be use- ful for many domains, especially for processing the increasing amount of conversation recordings (tele- phone conversations, customer service, round-table discussions or interviews in broadcast programs) where we often need to find a person’s opinion or attitude, for example, “how does the speaker think about capital punishment and why?”. This kind of questions can be treated as a topic-oriented opin- ion summarization task. Opinion summarization was run as a pilot task in Text Analysis Conference (TAC) in 2008. The task was to produce summaries of opinions on specified targets from a set of blog documents. In this study, we investigate this prob- lem using spontaneous conversations. The problem is defined as, given a conversation and a topic, a summarization system needs to generate a summary of the speaker’s opinion towards the topic. This task is built upon opinion recognition and topic or query based summarization. However, this problem is challenging in that: (a) Summarization in spontaneous speech is more difficult than well struc- tured text (Mckeown et al., 2005), because speech is always less organized and has recognition errors when using speech recognition output; (b) Senti- ment analysis in dialogues is also much harder be- cause of the genre difference compared to other do- mains like product reviews or news resources, as re- ported in (Raaijmakers et al., 2008); (c) In conversa- tional speech, information density is low and there are often off topic discussions, therefore presenting a need to identify utterances that are relevant to the topic. In this paper …
Content truncated to 500 words
Labeled Text
This paper presents a pilot study of opinion summarization on conversations. We create a corpus containing extractive and abstractive summaries of speaker’s opinion towards a given topic using 88 telephone conversations. We adopt two methods to perform extractive summarization. The first one is a sentence-ranking method that linearly combines scores measured from different aspects including topic relevance, subjectivity, and sentence importance. The second one is a graph-based method, which incorporates topic and sentiment information, as well as additional information about sentence-to-sentence relations extracted based on dialogue structure. Our evaluation results show that both methods significantly outperform the baseline approach that extracts the longest utterances. In particular, we find that incorporating dialogue structure in the graph-based method contributes to the improved system performance. 1
Publication Details
- Paper ID:
- 36397
- Year:
- 2011
- Publication:
- TIPSTER
- Publication Type:
- conf
- DOI:
- nan