In Layman’s Terms: Semi-Open Relation Extraction from Scientific Texts

38192

Authors

nan

Abstract

AbstractInformation Extraction (IE) from scientific texts can be used to guide readers to the central information in scientific documents. But narrow IE systems extract only a fraction of the information captured, and Open IE systems do not perform well on the long and complex sentences encountered in scientific texts. In this work we combine the output of both types of systems to achieve Semi-Open Relation Extraction, a new task that we explore in the Biology domain. First, we present the Focused Open Biological Information Extraction (FOBIE) dataset and use FOBIE to train a state-of-the-art narrow scientific IE system to extract trade-off relations and arguments that are central to biology texts. We then run both the narrow IE system and a state-of-the-art Open IE system on a corpus of 10K open-access scientific biological texts. We show that a significant amount (65%) of erroneous and uninformative Open IE extractions can be filtered using narrow IE extractions. Furthermore, we show that the retained extractions are significantly more often informative to a reader.

Keywords

nan

Full Content

Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1489–1500 July 5 - 10, 2020. c⃝2020 Association for Computational Linguistics 1489 In Layman’s Terms: Semi-Open Relation Extraction from Scientific Texts Ruben Kruiper∗, Julian F.V. Vincent, Jessica Chen-Burger, Marc P.Y. Desmulliez, Ioannis Konstas Heriot-Watt University Riccarton Campus, EH14 4AS Edinburgh, United Kingdom ∗Corresponding author: rk22@hw.ac.uk Abstract Information Extraction (IE) from scientific texts can be used to guide readers to the central information in scientific documents. But nar- row IE systems extract only a fraction of the information captured, and Open IE systems do not perform well on the long and complex sen- tences encountered in scientific texts. In this work we combine the output of both types of systems to achieve Semi-Open Relation Ex- traction, a new task that we explore in the Bi- ology domain. First, we present the Focused Open Biological Information Extraction (FO- BIE) dataset and use FOBIE to train a state-of- the-art narrow scientific IE system to extract trade-off relations and arguments that are cen- tral to biology texts. We then run both the nar- row IE system and a state-of-the-art Open IE system on a corpus of 10k open-access scien- tific biological texts. We show that a signifi- cant amount (65%) of erroneous and uninfor- mative Open IE extractions can be filtered us- ing narrow IE extractions. Furthermore, we show that the retained extractions are signifi- cantly more often informative to a reader.1 1 Introduction Identifying the central theme and concepts in sci- entific texts is a time-consuming task for experts and a hard task for laymen (Alper et al., 2004; El- Arini and Guestrin, 2011; Pain, 2016). This prob- lem is even more pronounced in inter-disciplinary fields of study, where experts in a target domain often lack the deeper knowledge of a source do- main (Carr et al., 2018). A specific example is biomimetics, an engineering problem-solving pro- cess in which one draws on analogous biological solutions (Kruiper et al., 2016). A major issue is that engineers (target domain) know little biol- ogy (source domain) or characteristics of plants or 1We release FOBIE and code at https://github. com/rubenkruiper/FOBIE. Figure 1: Example of Semi-Open Relation Extraction in the Biology domain (Burgess et al., 2006). We first extract the TRADE-OFF expressed between the central concepts ‘safety’ and ‘efficiency’ (in blue), that takes place specifically in ‘conifer species’ (in green). We further explore the content of a paper by investigating the results of an Open Information Extraction (OIE) system (in red). The central concepts captured by a TRADE-OFF mechanism enable the filtering of many irrelevant OIE extractions, which are found to be error- prone in scientific texts. Further OIE extractions found in the document can shed light on the semantic mean- ing of relevant concepts, e.g., ‘xylem’, as depicted at the top of the Figure (in the red box). animals (Vattam and Goel, 2013). This domain- mismatch complicates searching for and reason- ing over relevant scientific information, rendering biomimetics adventitious and solutions serendipi- tous …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

AbstractInformation Extraction (IE) from scientific texts can be used to guide readers to the central information in scientific documents. But narrow IE systems extract only a fraction of the information captured, and Open IE systems do not perform well on the long and complex sentences encountered in scientific texts. In this work we combine the output of both types of systems to achieve Semi-Open Relation Extraction, a new task that we explore in the Biology domain. First, we present the Focused Open Biological Information Extraction (FOBIE) dataset and use FOBIE to train a state-of-the-art narrow scientific IE system to extract trade-off relations and arguments that are central to biology texts. We then run both the narrow IE system and a state-of-the-art Open IE system on a corpus of 10K open-access scientific biological texts. We show that a significant amount (65%) of erroneous and uninformative Open IE extractions can be filtered using narrow IE extractions. Furthermore, we show that the retained extractions are significantly more often informative to a reader.

Publication Details

Paper ID:
38192
Year:
2020
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan