Other Topics You May Also Agree or Disagree: Modeling Inter-Topic Preferences using Tweets and Matrix Factorization
40075Authors
nan
Abstract
AbstractWe presents in this paper our approach for modeling inter-topic preferences of Twitter users: for example, “those who agree with the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) also agree with free trade”. This kind of knowledge is useful not only for stance detection across multiple topics but also for various real-world applications including public opinion survey, electoral prediction, electoral campaigns, and online debates. In order to extract users’ preferences on Twitter, we design linguistic patterns in which people agree and disagree about specific topics (e.g., “A is completely wrong”). By applying these linguistic patterns to a collection of tweets, we extract statements agreeing and disagreeing with various topics. Inspired by previous work on item recommendation, we formalize the task of modeling inter-topic preferences as matrix factorization: representing users’ preference as a user-topic matrix and mapping both users and topics onto a latent feature space that abstracts the preferences. Our experimental results demonstrate both that our presented approach is useful in predicting missing preferences of users and that the latent vector representations of topics successfully encode inter-topic preferences.
Keywords
Full Content
Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 398–408 Vancouver, Canada, July 30 - August 4, 2017. c⃝2017 Association for Computational Linguistics https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-1037 Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 398–408 Vancouver, Canada, July 30 - August 4, 2017. c⃝2017 Association for Computational Linguistics https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-1037 Other Topics You May Also Agree or Disagree: Modeling Inter-Topic Preferences using Tweets and Matrix Factorization Akira Sasaki, Kazuaki Hanawa, Naoaki Okazaki, and Kentaro Inui Graduate School of Information Sciences Tohoku University {aki-s, hanawa, okazaki, inui}@ecei.tohoku.ac.jp Abstract We present in this paper our approach for modeling inter-topic preferences of Twit- ter users: for example, those who agree with the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) also agree with free trade. This kind of knowledge is useful not only for stance detection across multiple topics but also for various real-world applications includ- ing public opinion surveys, electoral pre- dictions, electoral campaigns, and online debates. In order to extract users’ prefer- ences on Twitter, we design linguistic pat- terns in which people agree and disagree about specific topics (e.g., “A is com- pletely wrong”). By applying these lin- guistic patterns to a collection of tweets, we extract statements agreeing and dis- agreeing with various topics. Inspired by previous work on item recommendation, we formalize the task of modeling inter- topic preferences as matrix factorization: representing users’ preferences as a user- topic matrix and mapping both users and topics onto a latent feature space that ab- stracts the preferences. Our experimental results demonstrate both that our proposed approach is useful in predicting missing preferences of users and that the latent vector representations of topics success- fully encode inter-topic preferences. 1 Introduction Social media have changed the way people shape public opinion. The latest survey by the Pew Research Center reported that a majority of US adults (62%) obtain news via social media, and of those, 18% do so often (Gottfried and Shearer, 2016). Given that news and opinions are shared and amplified by friend networks of individu- als (Jamieson and Cappella, 2008), individuals are thereby isolated from information that does not fit well with their opinions (Pariser, 2011). Ironi- cally, cutting-edge social media technologies pro- mote ideological groups even with its potential to deliver diverse information. A large number of studies already analyzed discussions, interactions, influences, and commu- nities on social media along the political spec- trum from liberal to conservative (Adamic and Glance, 2005; Zhou et al., 2011; Cohen and Ruths, 2013; Bakshy et al., 2015; Wong et al., 2016). Even though these studies provide intuitive vi- sualizations and interpretations along the liberal- conservative axis, political analysts argue that the axis is flawed and insufficient for representing public opinion and ideologies (Kerlinger, 1984; Maddox and Lilie, 1984). A potential solution for analyzing multiple axes of the political spectrum on social media is stance detection (Thomas et al., 2006; Somasundaran and Wiebe, 2009; Murakami and Raymond, 2010; Anand et al., 2011; Walker et al., 2012; Moham- mad et al., 2016; …
Content truncated to 500 words
Labeled Text
AbstractWe presents in this paper our approach for modeling inter-topic preferences of Twitter users: for example, “those who agree with the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) also agree with free trade”. This kind of knowledge is useful not only for stance detection across multiple topics but also for various real-world applications including public opinion survey, electoral prediction, electoral campaigns, and online debates. In order to extract users’ preferences on Twitter, we design linguistic patterns in which people agree and disagree about specific topics (e.g., “A is completely wrong”). By applying these linguistic patterns to a collection of tweets, we extract statements agreeing and disagreeing with various topics. Inspired by previous work on item recommendation, we formalize the task of modeling inter-topic preferences as matrix factorization: representing users’ preference as a user-topic matrix and mapping both users and topics onto a latent feature space that abstracts the preferences. Our experimental results demonstrate both that our presented approach is useful in predicting missing preferences of users and that the latent vector representations of topics successfully encode inter-topic preferences.
Publication Details
- Paper ID:
- 40075
- Year:
- 2017
- Publication:
- TIPSTER
- Publication Type:
- conf
- DOI:
- nan