Behind the Article: Recognizing Dialog Acts in Wikipedia Talk Pages
43601Authors
nan
Abstract
In this paper, we propose an annota- tion schema for the discourse analysis of Wikipedia Talk pages aimed at the coor- dination efforts for article improvement. We apply the annotation schema to a cor- pus of 100 Talk pages from the Simple English Wikipedia and make the resulting dataset freely available for download1. Fur- thermore, we perform automatic dialog act classification on Wikipedia discussions and achieve an average F1-score of 0.82 with our classification pipeline. 1
Keywords
Full Content
Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 777–786, Avignon, France, April 23 - 27 2012. c⃝2012 Association for Computational Linguistics Behind the Article: Recognizing Dialog Acts in Wikipedia Talk Pages Oliver Ferschke‡, Iryna Gurevych†‡ and Yevgen Chebotar‡ † Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing Lab (UKP-DIPF) German Institute for Educational Research and Educational Information ‡ Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing Lab (UKP-TUDA) Department of Computer Science Technische Universit¨at Darmstadt http://www.ukp.tu-darmstadt.de Abstract In this paper, we propose an annota- tion schema for the discourse analysis of Wikipedia Talk pages aimed at the coor- dination efforts for article improvement. We apply the annotation schema to a cor- pus of 100 Talk pages from the Simple English Wikipedia and make the resulting dataset freely available for download1. Fur- thermore, we perform automatic dialog act classification on Wikipedia discussions and achieve an average F1-score of 0.82 with our classification pipeline. 1 Introduction Over the past decade, the paradigm of information sharing in the web has shifted towards participa- tory and collaborative content production. Texts are no longer exclusively prepared by individuals and then shared with the community. They are in- creasingly created collaboratively by multiple au- thors and iteratively revised by the community. When researchers first conducted surveys on professional writers in the 1980s, they found that the collaborative writing process differs consider- ably from the way individual writing is done (Pos- ner and Baecker, 1992). In joint writing, the writ- ers have to externalize processes that are other- wise not made explicit, like the planning and the organization of the text. The authors have to com- municate how the text should be written and what exactly it should contain. Today, many tools are available that support collaborative writing. A tool that has particu- larly taken hold is the Wiki, a web-based, asyn- 1http://www.ukp.tu-darmstadt.de/data/ wikidiscourse chronous co-authoring tool. A unique character- istic of Wikis is the documentation of the edit history which keeps track of every change that is made to a Wiki page. With this information, it is possible to reconstruct the writing process from the beginning to the end. Additionally, many Wikis offer their users a communication platform, the Talk pages, where they can discuss the ongo- ing writing process with other users. The most prominent example for a successful, large-scale Wiki is Wikipedia, a collaboratively created online encyclopedia, which has grown considerably since its launch in 2001, and con- tains a total of almost 20 million articles in 282 languages and dialects, as of Sept. 2011. As there is no editorial body that manages Wikipedia top- down, it is an open question how the huge on- line community around Wikipedia regulates and enforces standards of behavior and article qual- ity. The user discussions on the article Talk pages might shed light on this issue and give an insight into the otherwise hidden processes of collabora- tion that, until now, could only be analyzed via interviews or group observations in experimental settings. The main goal of the present …
Content truncated to 500 words
Labeled Text
In this paper, we propose an annotation schema for the discourse analysis of Wikipedia Talk pages aimed at the coordination efforts for article improvement. We apply the annotation schema to a corpus of 100 Talk pages from the Simple English Wikipedia and make the resulting dataset freely available for download1. Furthermore, we perform automatic dialog act classification on Wikipedia discussions and achieve an average F1-score of 0.82 with our classification pipeline. 1
Publication Details
- Paper ID:
- 43601
- Year:
- 2012
- Publication:
- TIPSTER
- Publication Type:
- conf
- DOI:
- nan