FactPEGASUS: Factuality-Aware Pre-training and Fine-tuning for Abstractive Summarization

21406

Authors

nan

Abstract

AbstractWe present FactPEGASUS, an abstractive summarization model that addresses the problem of factuality during pre-training and fine-tuning: (1) We augment the sentence selection strategy of PEGASUS’s (Zhang et al., 2019) pre-training objective to create pseudo-summaries that are both important and factual; (2) We introduce three complementary components for fine-tuning. The corrector removes hallucinations present in the reference summary, the contrastor uses contrastive learning to better differentiate nonfactual summaries from factual ones, and the connector bridges the gap between the pre-training and fine-tuning for better transfer of knowledge. Experiments on three downstream tasks demonstrate that FactPEGASUS substantially improves factuality evaluated by multiple automatic metrics and humans. Our thorough analysis suggests that FactPEGASUS is more factual than using the original pre-training objective in zero-shot and few-shot settings, retains factual behavior more robustly than strong baselines, and does not rely entirely on becoming more extractive to improve factuality.

Keywords

nan

Full Content

Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 1010 - 1028 July 10-15, 2022 ©2022 Association for Computational Linguistics FACTPEGASUS: Factuality-Aware Pre-training and Fine-tuning for Abstractive Summarization David Wan and Mohit Bansal University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill {davidwan,mbansal}@cs.unc.edu Abstract We present FACTPEGASUS, an abstractive summarization model that addresses the prob- lem of factuality during pre-training and fine- tuning: (1) We augment the sentence selec- tion strategy of PEGASUS’s (Zhang et al., 2020) pre-training objective to create pseudo- summaries that are both important and factual; (2) We introduce three complementary compo- nents for fine-tuning. The corrector removes hallucinations present in the reference sum- mary, the contrastor uses contrastive learning to better differentiate nonfactual summaries from factual ones, and the connector bridges the gap between the pre-training and fine- tuning for better transfer of knowledge. Exper- iments on three downstream tasks demonstrate that FACTPEGASUS substantially improves factuality evaluated by multiple automatic met- rics and humans. Our thorough analysis sug- gests that FACTPEGASUS is more factual than using the original pre-training objective in zero-shot and few-shot settings, retains factual behavior more robustly than strong baselines, and does not rely entirely on becoming more extractive to improve factuality.1 1 Introduction Abstractive summarization aims at generating short summaries that capture the essentials of a long document. Research in this challenging task has made significant progress with the help of large pre-trained models (Lewis et al., 2020; Raffel et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). However, current mod- els suffer from the crucial problem of hallucina- tions (Maynez et al., 2020), where a summary con- tains facts or entities not present in the original document. Such unfaithful generation raises the question of whether the models can be trustwor- thy and used safely for real-world applications. To tackle this problem, many approaches propose post- processing models (Chen et al., 2021; Dong et al., 1Our code and data are publicly available at: https: //github.com/meetdavidwan/factpegasus. 2020; Liu and Liu, 2021), but such methods are often constrained by external resources to train ad- ditional correction or selection models. An alter- native line of works focuses on learning factuality directly during fine-tuning by filtering nonfactual training data (Goyal and Durrett, 2021; Nan et al., 2021) or, most recently, incorporating contrastive learning (Cao and Wang, 2021) to encourage gen- erating faithful summaries. In this work, we propose FACTPEGASUS, a model that addresses the problem of hallucina- tions for abstractive summarization holistically, by incorporating factuality into the whole train- ing pipeline: We tackle the lack of factuality ob- jective in pre-training and the presence of hallu- cinations in the downstream dataset during fine- tuning. Current pre-training objectives focus on improving the quality of the generated output in the downstream tasks but often overlook the factuality aspect. Thus, we explore incorporating factual- ity into the pre-training objective of PEGASUS (Zhang et al., 2020) (a state-of-the-art abstractive summarization model). The original objective, gap sentence generation (GSG), transforms any text into a …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

AbstractWe present FactPEGASUS, an abstractive summarization model that addresses the problem of factuality during pre-training and fine-tuning: (1) We augment the sentence selection strategy of PEGASUS’s (Zhang et al., 2019) pre-training objective to create pseudo-summaries that are both important and factual; (2) We introduce three complementary components for fine-tuning. The corrector removes hallucinations present in the reference summary, the contrastor uses contrastive learning to better differentiate nonfactual summaries from factual ones, and the connector bridges the gap between the pre-training and fine-tuning for better transfer of knowledge. Experiments on three downstream tasks demonstrate that FactPEGASUS substantially improves factuality evaluated by multiple automatic metrics and humans. Our thorough analysis suggests that FactPEGASUS is more factual than using the original pre-training objective in zero-shot and few-shot settings, retains factual behavior more robustly than strong baselines, and does not rely entirely on becoming more extractive to improve factuality.

Publication Details

Paper ID:
21406
Year:
2022
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan