HHS at SemEval-2023 Task 10: A Comparative Analysis of Sexism Detection Based on the RoBERTa Model

24843

Authors

nan

Abstract

AbstractThis paper describes the methods and models applied by our team HHS in SubTask-A of SemEval-2023 Task 10 about sexism detection. In this task, we trained with the officially released data and analyzed the performance of five models, TextCNN, BERT, RoBERTa, XLNet, and Sup-SimCSE-RoBERTa. The experiments show that most of the models can achieve good results. Then, we tried data augmentation, model ensemble, dropout, and other operations on several of these models, and compared the results for analysis. In the end, the most effective approach that yielded the best results on the test set involved the following steps: enhancing the sexist data using dropout, feeding it as input to the Sup-SimCSE-RoBERTa model, and providing the raw data as input to the XLNet model. Then, combining the outputs of the two methods led to even better results. This method yielded a Macro-F1 score of 0.823 in the final evaluation phase of the SubTask-A of the competition.

Keywords

nan

Full Content

Proceedings of the The 17th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2023), pages 963–968 July 13-14, 2023 ©2023 Association for Computational Linguistics HHS at SemEval-2023 Task 10: A Comparative Analysis of Sexism Detection Based on the RoBERTa Model Yao Zhang Yunnan University 18314275485@163.com Liqing Wang* Yunnan University wlq@ynu.edu.cn Abstract This paper describes the methods and mod- els applied by our team HHS in SubTask-A of SemEval-2023 Task 10 about sexism detec- tion. In this task, we trained with the officially released data and analyzed the performance of five models, TextCNN, BERT, RoBERTa, XLNet, and Sup-SimCSE-RoBERTa. The ex- periments show that most of the models can achieve good results. Then, we tried data aug- mentation, model ensemble, dropout, and other operations on several of these models, and com- pared the results for analysis. In the end, the most effective approach that yielded the best re- sults on the test set involved the following steps: enhancing the sexist data using dropout, feed- ing it as input to the Sup-SimCSE-RoBERTa model, and providing the raw data as input to the XLNet model. Then, combining the outputs of the two methods led to even better results. This method yielded a Macro-F1 score of 0.823 in the final evaluation phase of the SubTask-A of the competition. 1 Introduction Sexism has long existed in society, causing various asymmetries and inequities, and harming some peo- ple. Given the enormity of data and the fast-paced flow of information on the internet, addressing sex- ism still poses a significant challenge (Kirk et al., 2023). Web technologies are rapidly evolving and automated detection is widely used for sexism, ex- cept that most tools only give generic categories without further explanation of what sexism is and do not improve the interpretability, trust and under- standing of the tools. In the past, computers were frequently used to conduct application tests for sexism by many peo- ple. Multiple social media platforms have been used to analyze cyberbullying detection using var- ious topics based on deep learning models and transfer learning (Agrawal and Awekar, 2018). A method has been proposed that can detect and an- alyze three characteristics of Twitter tweets: pa- triarchal behavior, misogyny and sexism (Frenda et al., 2019). (Farrell et al., 2019) demonstrated an increasing pattern of misogynistic content and users as well as violent attitudes. Fine-grained, multi-label sexism account classification has been explored, and the first semi-supervised multi-label sexism account classification has been proposed (Abburi et al., 2021). (Guest et al., 2021) proposed a new hierarchical taxonomy for online misogyny and produced a related labeled dataset. Sexism takes many forms on the web, some are fixed words of sexism, some are new words, and many forms of sexism require contextual, temporal and geographi- cal understanding. Thus much of this sexism detec- tion is subjective and relative. This also means that sexism data is hard to find, requiring a lot of man- ual annotation effort. Therefore, we participated in the SemEval-2023 shared Task 10 (Kirk et al., 2023), which aims to identify …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

AbstractThis paper describes the methods and models applied by our team HHS in SubTask-A of SemEval-2023 Task 10 about sexism detection. In this task, we trained with the officially released data and analyzed the performance of five models, TextCNN, BERT, RoBERTa, XLNet, and Sup-SimCSE-RoBERTa. The experiments show that most of the models can achieve good results. Then, we tried data augmentation, model ensemble, dropout, and other operations on several of these models, and compared the results for analysis. In the end, the most effective approach that yielded the best results on the test set involved the following steps: enhancing the sexist data using dropout, feeding it as input to the Sup-SimCSE-RoBERTa model, and providing the raw data as input to the XLNet model. Then, combining the outputs of the two methods led to even better results. This method yielded a Macro-F1 score of 0.823 in the final evaluation phase of the SubTask-A of the competition.

Publication Details

Paper ID:
24843
Year:
2023
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan