Investigating Transfer Learning in Multilingual Pre-trained Language Models through Chinese Natural Language Inference
33853Authors
nan
Abstract
Multilingual transformers (XLM, mT5) have been shown to have remarkable transfer skills in zero-shot settings. Most transfer studies, however, rely on automatically translated re- sources (XNLI, XQuAD), making it hard to discern the particular linguistic knowledge that is being transferred, and the role of expert an- notated monolingual datasets when develop- ing task-specific models. We investigate the cross-lingual transfer abilities of XLM-R for Chinese and English natural language infer- ence (NLI), with a focus on the recent large- scale Chinese dataset OCNLI. To better un- derstand linguistic transfer, we created 4 cat- egories of challenge and adversarial tasks (to- taling 17 new datasets1) for Chinese that build on several well-known resources for English (e.g., HANS, NLI stress-tests). We find that cross-lingual models trained on English NLI do transfer well across our Chinese tasks (e.g., in 3/4 of our challenge categories, they per- form as well/better than the best monolingual models, even on 3/5 uniquely Chinese lin- guistic phenomena such as idioms, pro drop). These results, however, come with important caveats: cross-lingual models often perform best when trained on a mixture of English and high-quality monolingual NLI data (OCNLI), and are often hindered by automatically trans- lated resources (XNLI-zh). For many phenom- ena, all models continue to struggle, highlight- ing the need for our new diagnostics to help benchmark Chinese and cross-lingual models. 1
Keywords
Full Content
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021, pages 3770–3785 August 1–6, 2021. ©2021 Association for Computational Linguistics 3770 Investigating Transfer Learning in Multilingual Pre-trained Language Models through Chinese Natural Language Inference Hai Hu†÷× He Zhou† Zuoyu Tian† Yiwen Zhang† Yina Ma‡ Yanting Li◁ Yixin Nie○ Kyle Richardson◇ †Indiana University Bloomington ‡Brigham Young University ÷×Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. ◁Northwestern University ○UNC Chapel Hill ◇Allen Institute for AI hu.hai@outlook.com; {hzh1,zuoytian,yiwezhan,yinama}@iu.edu; yanting.li@northwestern.edu; yixin1@cs.unc.edu; kyler@allenai.org Abstract Multilingual transformers (XLM, mT5) have been shown to have remarkable transfer skills in zero-shot settings. Most transfer studies, however, rely on automatically translated re- sources (XNLI, XQuAD), making it hard to discern the particular linguistic knowledge that is being transferred, and the role of expert an- notated monolingual datasets when develop- ing task-specific models. We investigate the cross-lingual transfer abilities of XLM-R for Chinese and English natural language infer- ence (NLI), with a focus on the recent large- scale Chinese dataset OCNLI. To better un- derstand linguistic transfer, we created 4 cat- egories of challenge and adversarial tasks (to- taling 17 new datasets1) for Chinese that build on several well-known resources for English (e.g., HANS, NLI stress-tests). We find that cross-lingual models trained on English NLI do transfer well across our Chinese tasks (e.g., in 3/4 of our challenge categories, they per- form as well/better than the best monolingual models, even on 3/5 uniquely Chinese lin- guistic phenomena such as idioms, pro drop). These results, however, come with important caveats: cross-lingual models often perform best when trained on a mixture of English and high-quality monolingual NLI data (OCNLI), and are often hindered by automatically trans- lated resources (XNLI-zh). For many phenom- ena, all models continue to struggle, highlight- ing the need for our new diagnostics to help benchmark Chinese and cross-lingual models. 1 Introduction Recent pre-trained multilingual transformer mod- els, such as XLM(-R) (Conneau and Lample, 2019; Conneau et al., 2020), mT5 (Xue et al., 2020) and others (Liu et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2020) have 1All new datasets/code are released at https://github.com/ huhailinguist/ChineseNLIProbing. been shown to be successful in NLP tasks for sev- eral non-English languages (Khashabi et al., 2020; Choi et al., 2021), as well as in multilingual bench- marks (Devlin et al., 2019; Conneau et al., 2020; Xue et al., 2020; Artetxe et al., 2020). A particular appeal is that they can be used for cross-lingual and zero-shot transfer. That is, after pre-training on a raw, unaligned corpus consisting of text from many languages, models can be subsequently fine-tuned on a particular task in a resource-rich language (e.g., English) and directly applied to the same task in other languages without requiring any additional language-specific training. Given this recent progress, a natural question arises: does it make sense to invest in large-scale task-specific dataset construction for low-resourced languages, or does cross-lingual transfer alone suf- fice for many languages and tasks? A closely re- lated question is: how well do multilingual mod- els transfer across specific linguistic and language- specific phenomena? While there has been …
Content truncated to 500 words
Labeled Text
Multilingual transformers (XLM, mT5) have been shown to have remarkable transfer skills in zero-shot settings. Most transfer studies, however, rely on automatically translated resources (XNLI, XQuAD), making it hard to discern the particular linguistic knowledge that is being transferred, and the role of expert annotated monolingual datasets when developing task-specific models. We investigate the cross-lingual transfer abilities of XLM-R for Chinese and English natural language inference (NLI), with a focus on the recent largescale Chinese dataset OCNLI. To better understand linguistic transfer, we created 4 categories of challenge and adversarial tasks (totaling 17 new datasets1) for Chinese that build on several well-known resources for English (e.g., HANS, NLI stress-tests). We find that cross-lingual models trained on English NLI do transfer well across our Chinese tasks (e.g., in 3/4 of our challenge categories, they perform as well/better than the best monolingual models, even on 3/5 uniquely Chinese linguistic phenomena such as idioms, pro drop). These results, however, come with important caveats: cross-lingual models often perform best when trained on a mixture of English and high-quality monolingual NLI data (OCNLI), and are often hindered by automatically translated resources (XNLI-zh). For many phenomena, all models continue to struggle, highlighting the need for our new diagnostics to help benchmark Chinese and cross-lingual models. 1
Publication Details
- Paper ID:
- 33853
- Year:
- 2021
- Publication:
- TIPSTER
- Publication Type:
- conf
- DOI:
- nan