ILDAE: Instance-Level Difficulty Analysis of Evaluation Data

39140

Authors

nan

Abstract

AbstractKnowledge of difficulty level of questions helps a teacher in several ways, such as estimating students’ potential quickly by asking carefully selected questions and improving quality of examination by modifying trivial and hard questions. Can we extract such benefits of instance difficulty in Natural Language Processing? To this end, we conduct Instance-Level Difficulty Analysis of Evaluation data (ILDAE) in a large-scale setup of 23 datasets and demonstrate its five novel applications: 1) conducting efficient-yet-accurate evaluations with fewer instances saving computational cost and time, 2) improving quality of existing evaluation datasets by repairing erroneous and trivial instances, 3) selecting the best model based on application requirements, 4) analyzing dataset characteristics for guiding future data creation, 5) estimating Out-of-Domain performance reliably. Comprehensive experiments for these applications lead to several interesting results, such as evaluation using just 5% instances (selected via ILDAE) achieves as high as 0.93 Kendall correlation with evaluation using complete dataset and computing weighted accuracy using difficulty scores leads to 5.2% higher correlation with Out-of-Domain performance. We release the difficulty scores and hope our work will encourage research in this important yet understudied field of leveraging instance difficulty in evaluations.

Keywords

nan

Full Content

Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Volume 1: Long Papers, pages 3412 - 3425 May 22-27, 2022 c⃝2022 Association for Computational Linguistics ILDAE: Instance-Level Difficulty Analysis of Evaluation Data Neeraj Varshney, Swaroop Mishra, Chitta Baral Arizona State University {nvarshn2, srmishr1, cbaral}@asu.edu Abstract Knowledge of difficulty level of questions helps a teacher in several ways, such as estimating students’ potential quickly by asking carefully selected questions and improving quality of ex- amination by modifying trivial and hard ques- tions. Can we extract such benefits of instance difficulty in Natural Language Processing? To this end, we conduct Instance-Level Difficulty Analysis of Evaluation data (ILDAE) in a large- scale setup of 23 datasets and demonstrate its five novel applications: 1) conducting efficient- yet-accurate evaluations with fewer instances saving computational cost and time, 2) improv- ing quality of existing evaluation datasets by repairing erroneous and trivial instances, 3) se- lecting the best model based on application re- quirements, 4) analyzing dataset characteristics for guiding future data creation, 5) estimating Out-of-Domain performance reliably. Com- prehensive experiments for these applications lead to several interesting results, such as eval- uation using just 5% instances (selected via ILDAE) achieves as high as 0.93 Kendall cor- relation with evaluation using complete dataset and computing weighted accuracy using diffi- culty scores leads to 5.2% higher correlation with Out-of-Domain performance. We release the difficulty scores1 and hope our work will encourage research in this important yet under- studied field of leveraging instance difficulty in evaluations. 1 Introduction Transformer-based language models (Devlin et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2019; Clark et al., 2020) have im- proved state-of-the-art performance on numerous natural language processing benchmarks (Wang et al., 2018, 2019; Talmor et al., 2019); however, recent studies (Zhong et al., 2021; Sagawa et al., 2020) have raised questions regarding whether these models are uniformly better across all in- stances. This has drawn attention towards instance- 1https://github.com/nrjvarshney/ILDAE Figure 1: Illustrating five applications of Instance-Level Difficulty Analysis of Evaluation data (ILDAE). level analysis of evaluation data (Rodriguez et al., 2021; Vania et al., 2021; Mishra and Arunkumar, 2021) which was previously limited to training data (Swayamdipta et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020; Mishra and Sachdeva, 2020). Furthermore, it is intuitive that not all instances in a dataset are equally dif- ficult. However, instance-level difficulty analysis of evaluation data (ILDAE) has remained underex- plored in many different ways: what are the poten- tial applications and broad impact associated with ILDAE? In this work, we address the above question by first computing difficulty scores of evaluation in- stances (section 2) and then demonstrating five novel applications of ILDAE (Figure 1). 1. Efficient Evaluations: We propose an ap- proach of conducting efficient-yet-accurate eval- uations. Our approach uses as little as 5% eval- uation instances (selected via ILDAE) to achieve up to 0.93 Kendall correlation with evaluations conducted using the complete dataset. Thus, without considerably impacting the effective- ness of evaluations, our approach saves compu- tational cost and time. 3412 2. Improving …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

AbstractKnowledge of difficulty level of questions helps a teacher in several ways, such as estimating students’ potential quickly by asking carefully selected questions and improving quality of examination by modifying trivial and hard questions. Can we extract such benefits of instance difficulty in Natural Language Processing? To this end, we conduct Instance-Level Difficulty Analysis of Evaluation data (ILDAE) in a large-scale setup of 23 datasets and demonstrate its five novel applications: 1) conducting efficient-yet-accurate evaluations with fewer instances saving computational cost and time, 2) improving quality of existing evaluation datasets by repairing erroneous and trivial instances, 3) selecting the best model based on application requirements, 4) analyzing dataset characteristics for guiding future data creation, 5) estimating Out-of-Domain performance reliably. Comprehensive experiments for these applications lead to several interesting results, such as evaluation using just 5% instances (selected via ILDAE) achieves as high as 0.93 Kendall correlation with evaluation using complete dataset and computing weighted accuracy using difficulty scores leads to 5.2% higher correlation with Out-of-Domain performance. We release the difficulty scores and hope our work will encourage research in this important yet understudied field of leveraging instance difficulty in evaluations.

Publication Details

Paper ID:
39140
Year:
2022
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan