Multilingual Dependency Analysis with a Two-Stage Discriminative Parser
42134Authors
nan
Abstract
We present a two-stage multilingual de- pendency parser and evaluate it on 13 diverse languages. The first stage is based on the unlabeled dependency pars- ing models described by McDonald and Pereira (2006) augmented with morpho- logical features for a subset of the lan- guages. The second stage takes the out- put from the first and labels all the edges in the dependency graph with appropri- ate syntactic categories using a globally trained sequence classifier over compo- nents of the graph. We report results on the CoNLL-X shared task (Buchholz et al., 2006) data sets and present an error analysis. 1
Keywords
Full Content
Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-X), pages 216–220, New York City, June 2006. c⃝2006 Association for Computational Linguistics Multilingual Dependency Analysis with a Two-Stage Discriminative Parser Ryan McDonald Kevin Lerman Fernando Pereira Department of Computer and Information Science University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA {ryantm,klerman,pereira}@cis.upenn.edu Abstract We present a two-stage multilingual de- pendency parser and evaluate it on 13 diverse languages. The first stage is based on the unlabeled dependency pars- ing models described by McDonald and Pereira (2006) augmented with morpho- logical features for a subset of the lan- guages. The second stage takes the out- put from the first and labels all the edges in the dependency graph with appropri- ate syntactic categories using a globally trained sequence classifier over compo- nents of the graph. We report results on the CoNLL-X shared task (Buchholz et al., 2006) data sets and present an error analysis. 1 Introduction Often in language processing we require a deep syn- tactic representation of a sentence in order to assist further processing. With the availability of resources such as the Penn WSJ Treebank, much of the fo- cus in the parsing community had been on producing syntactic representations based on phrase-structure. However, recently their has been a revived interest in parsing models that produce dependency graph representations of sentences, which model words and their arguments through directed edges (Hud- son, 1984; Mel′ˇcuk, 1988). This interest has gener- ally come about due to the computationally efficient and flexible nature of dependency graphs and their ability to easily model non-projectivity in freer-word order languages. Nivre (2005) gives an introduction to dependency representations of sentences and re- cent developments in dependency parsing strategies. Dependency graphs also encode much of the deep syntactic information needed for further process- ing. This has been shown through their success- ful use in many standard natural language process- ing tasks, including machine translation (Ding and Palmer, 2005), sentence compression (McDonald, 2006), and textual inference (Haghighi et al., 2005). In this paper we describe a two-stage discrimi- native parsing approach consisting of an unlabeled parser and a subsequent edge labeler. We evaluate this parser on a diverse set of 13 languages using data provided by the CoNLL-X shared-task organiz- ers (Buchholz et al., 2006; Hajiˇc et al., 2004; Simov et al., 2005; Simov and Osenova, 2003; Chen et al., 2003; B¨ohmov´a et al., 2003; Kromann, 2003; van der Beek et al., 2002; Brants et al., 2002; Kawata and Bartels, 2000; Afonso et al., 2002; Dˇzeroski et al., 2006; Civit Torruella and Mart´ı Anton´ın, 2002; Nilsson et al., 2005; Oflazer et al., 2003; Atalay et al., 2003). The results are promising and show the language independence of our system under the as- sumption of a labeled dependency corpus in the tar- get language. For the remainder of this paper, we denote by x = x1, . . . xn a sentence with n words and by y a corresponding dependency graph. A depen- dency graph is represented by a set …
Content truncated to 500 words
Labeled Text
We present a two-stage multilingual dependency parser and evaluate it on 13 diverse languages. The first stage is based on the unlabeled dependency parsing models described by McDonald and Pereira (2006) augmented with morphological features for a subset of the languages. The second stage takes the output from the first and labels all the edges in the dependency graph with appropriate syntactic categories using a globally trained sequence classifier over components of the graph. We report results on the CoNLL-X shared task (Buchholz et al., 2006) data sets and present an error analysis. 1
Publication Details
- Paper ID:
- 42134
- Year:
- 2006
- Publication:
- TIPSTER
- Publication Type:
- conf
- DOI:
- nan