Semantic Role Labeling Via Generalized Inference Over Classifiers

42396

Authors

nan

Abstract

We present a system submitted to the CoNLL- 2004 shared task for semantic role labeling. The system is composed of a set of classifiers and an inference procedure used both to clean the classification results and to ensure struc- tural integrity of the final role labeling. Lin- guistic information is used to generate features during classification and constraints for the in- ference process. 1

Keywords

nan

Full Content

Semantic Role Labeling Via Generalized Inference Over Classifiers Vasin Punyakanok, Dan Roth, Wen-tau Yih, Dav Zimak Yuancheng Tu Department of Computer Science Department of Linguistics University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign {punyakan,danr,yih,davzimak,ytu}@uiuc.edu Abstract We present a system submitted to the CoNLL- 2004 shared task for semantic role labeling. The system is composed of a set of classifiers and an inference procedure used both to clean the classification results and to ensure struc- tural integrity of the final role labeling. Lin- guistic information is used to generate features during classification and constraints for the in- ference process. 1 Introduction Semantic role labeling is a complex task to discover pat- terns within sentences corresponding to semantic mean- ing. We believe it is hopeless to expect high levels of per- formance from either purely manual classifiers or purely learned classifiers. Rather, supplemental linguistic infor- mation must be used to support and correct a learning system. The system we present here is composed of two phases. First, a set of phrase candidates is produced using two learned classifiers—one to discover beginning positions and one to discover end positions for each argument type. Hopefully, this phase discovers a small superset of all phrases in the sentence (for each verb). In the second phase, the final prediction is made. First, candidate phrases from the first phase are re-scored using a classifier designed to determine argument type, given a candidate phrase. Because phrases are considered as a whole, global properties of the candidates can be used to discover how likely it is that a phrase is of a given ar- gument type. However, the set of possible role-labelings is restricted by structural and linguistic constraints. We encode these constraints using linear functions and use integer programming to ensure the final prediction is con- sistent (see Section 4). 2 SNoW Learning Architecture The learning algorithm used is a variation of the Winnow update rule incorporated in SNoW (Roth, 1998; Roth and Yih, 2002), a multi-class classifier that is specifically tai- lored for large scale learning tasks. SNoW learns a sparse network of linear functions, in which the targets (phrase border predictions or argument type predictions, in this case) are represented as linear functions over a common feature space. It incorporates several improvements over the basic Winnow update rule. In particular, a regular- ization term is added, which has the affect of trying to separate the data with a think separator (Grove and Roth, 2001; Hang et al., 2002). In the work presented here we use this regularization with a fixed parameter. Experimental evidence has shown that SNoW activa- tions are monotonic with the confidence in the prediction Therefore, it can provide a good source of probability es- timation. We use softmax (Bishop, 1995) over the raw ac- tivation values as conditional probabilities. Specifically, suppose the number of classes is n, and the raw activa- tion values of class i is acti. The posterior estimation for class i is derived by the following equation. score(i) = pi = eacti � …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

We present a system submitted to the CoNLL2004 shared task for semantic role labeling. The system is composed of a set of classifiers and an inference procedure used both to clean the classification results and to ensure structural integrity of the final role labeling. Linguistic information is used to generate features during classification and constraints for the inference process. 1

Publication Details

Paper ID:
42396
Year:
2004
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan