Reading to Learn: Constructing Features from Semantic Abstracts
44348Authors
nan
Abstract
s Jacob Eisenstein∗ James Clarke† Dan Goldwasser† Dan Roth∗† ∗Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, †Department of Computer Science University of Illinois Urbana, IL 61801 {jacobe,clarkeje,goldwas1,danr}@illinois.edu Abstract Machine learning offers a range of tools for training systems from data, but these methods are only as good as the underly- ing representation. This paper proposes to acquire representations for machine learn- ing by reading text written to accommo- date human learning. We propose a novel form of semantic analysis called read- ing to learn, where the goal is to obtain a high-level semantic abstract of multi- ple documents in a representation that fa- cilitates learning. We obtain this abstract through a generative model that requires no labeled data, instead leveraging repe- tition across multiple documents. The se- mantic abstract is converted into a trans- formed feature space for learning, result- ing in improved generalization on a rela- tional learning task. 1
Keywords
Full Content
Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 958–967, Singapore, 6-7 August 2009. c⃝2009 ACL and AFNLP Reading to Learn: Constructing Features from Semantic Abstracts Jacob Eisenstein∗ James Clarke† Dan Goldwasser† Dan Roth∗† ∗Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, †Department of Computer Science University of Illinois Urbana, IL 61801 {jacobe,clarkeje,goldwas1,danr}@illinois.edu Abstract Machine learning offers a range of tools for training systems from data, but these methods are only as good as the underly- ing representation. This paper proposes to acquire representations for machine learn- ing by reading text written to accommo- date human learning. We propose a novel form of semantic analysis called read- ing to learn, where the goal is to obtain a high-level semantic abstract of multi- ple documents in a representation that fa- cilitates learning. We obtain this abstract through a generative model that requires no labeled data, instead leveraging repe- tition across multiple documents. The se- mantic abstract is converted into a trans- formed feature space for learning, result- ing in improved generalization on a rela- tional learning task. 1 Introduction Machine learning offers a range of powerful tools for training systems to act in complex environ- ments, but these methods depend on a well-chosen representation for features. For learning to suc- ceed the representation often must be crafted with knowledge about the application domain. This poses a bottleneck, requiring expertise in both ma- chine learning and the application domain. How- ever, domain experts often express their knowl- edge through text; one direct expression is through text designed to aid human learning. In this paper we exploit text written by domain experts in or- der to build a more expressive representation for learning. We term this approach reading to learn. The following scenario demonstrates the moti- vation for reading to learn. Imagine an agent given a task within its world/environment. The agent has no prior knowledge of the task but can perceive the world through low-level sensors. Learning directly from the sensors may be difficult, as interesting tasks typically require a complex combination of sensors. Our goal is to acquire domain knowledge through the semantic analysis of text, so as to pro- duce higher-level relations through combinations of sensors. As a concrete example consider the problem of learning how to make legal moves in Freecell soli- taire. Relevant sensors may indicate if an object is a card or a freecell, whether a card is a certain value, and whether two values are in sequence. Although it is possible to express the rules with a combination of sensors, learning this combina- tion is difficult. Text can facilitate learning by pro- viding relations at the appropriate level of gen- eralization. For example, the sentence: “You can place a card on an empty freecell,” suggests not only which sensors are useful together but also how these sensors should be linked. Assuming the sensors are represented as predicates, one possi- ble relation this sentence suggests is: r(x, y) = card(x) ∧ freecell(y) ∧ empty(y). …
Content truncated to 500 words
Labeled Text
s Jacob Eisenstein∗ James Clarke† Dan Goldwasser† Dan Roth∗† ∗Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, †Department of Computer Science University of Illinois Urbana, IL 61801 {jacobe,clarkeje,goldwas1,danr}@illinois.edu Abstract Machine learning offers a range of tools for training systems from data, but these methods are only as good as the underlying representation. This paper proposes to acquire representations for machine learning by reading text written to accommodate human learning. We propose a novel form of semantic analysis called reading to learn, where the goal is to obtain a high-level semantic abstract of multiple documents in a representation that facilitates learning. We obtain this abstract through a generative model that requires no labeled data, instead leveraging repetition across multiple documents. The semantic abstract is converted into a transformed feature space for learning, resulting in improved generalization on a relational learning task. 1
Publication Details
- Paper ID:
- 44348
- Year:
- 2009
- Publication:
- TIPSTER
- Publication Type:
- conf
- DOI:
- nan