UKPDIPF: Lexical Semantic Approach to Sentiment Polarity Prediction in Twitter Data
22705Authors
nan
Abstract
We present a sentiment classification sys- tem that participated in the SemEval 2014 shared task on sentiment analysis in Twit- ter. Our system expands tokens in a tweet with semantically similar expressions us- ing a large novel distributional thesaurus and calculates the semantic relatedness of the expanded tweets to word lists repre- senting positive and negative sentiment. This approach helps to assess the polarity of tweets that do not directly contain po- larity cues. Moreover, we incorporate syn- tactic, lexical and surface sentiment fea- tures. On the message level, our system achieved the 8th place in terms of macro- averaged F-score among 50 systems, with particularly good performance on the Life- Journal corpus (F1=71.92) and the Twitter sarcasm (F1=54.59) dataset. On the ex- pression level, our system ranked 14 out of 27 systems, based on macro-averaged F-score. 1
Keywords
Full Content
Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014), pages 704–710, Dublin, Ireland, August 23-24, 2014. UKPDIPF: A Lexical Semantic Approach to Sentiment Polarity Prediction in Twitter Data Lucie Flekova†‡, Oliver Ferschke†‡ and Iryna Gurevych†‡ † Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing Lab (UKP-TUDA) Computer Science Department, Technische Universit¨at Darmstadt ‡ Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing Lab (UKP-DIPF) German Institute for Educational Research http://www.ukp.tu-darmstadt.de Abstract We present a sentiment classification sys- tem that participated in the SemEval 2014 shared task on sentiment analysis in Twit- ter. Our system expands tokens in a tweet with semantically similar expressions us- ing a large novel distributional thesaurus and calculates the semantic relatedness of the expanded tweets to word lists repre- senting positive and negative sentiment. This approach helps to assess the polarity of tweets that do not directly contain po- larity cues. Moreover, we incorporate syn- tactic, lexical and surface sentiment fea- tures. On the message level, our system achieved the 8th place in terms of macro- averaged F-score among 50 systems, with particularly good performance on the Life- Journal corpus (F1=71.92) and the Twitter sarcasm (F1=54.59) dataset. On the ex- pression level, our system ranked 14 out of 27 systems, based on macro-averaged F-score. 1 Introduction Microblogging sites, such as Twitter, have become an important source of information about current events. The fact that users write about their ex- periences, often directly during or shortly after an event, contributes to the high level of emo- tions in many such messages. Being able to auto- matically and reliably evaluate these emotions in context of a specific event or a product would be highly beneficial not only in marketing (Jansen et al., 2009) or public relations, but also in political sciences (O’Connor et al., 2010), disaster manage- This work is licensed under a Creative Commons At- tribution 4.0 International Licence. Page numbers and pro- ceedings footer are added by the organisers. Licence details: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ment, stock market analysis (Bollen et al., 2011) or the health sector (Culotta, 2010). Due to its large number of applications, senti- ment analysis on Twitter is a very popular task. Challenges arise both from the character of the task and from the language specifics of Twit- ter messages. Messages are normally very short and informal, frequently using slang, alternative spelling, neologism and links, and mostly ignor- ing the punctuation. Our experiments have been carried out as part of the SemEval 2014 Task 9 - Sentiment Anal- ysis on Twitter (Rosenthal et al., 2014), a rerun of a SemEval-2013 Task 2 (Nakov et al., 2013). The datasets are thus described in detail in the overview papers. The rerun uses the same train- ing and development data, but new test data from Twitter and a “surprise domain”. The task con- sists of two subtasks: an expression-level subtask (Subtask A) and a message-level subtask (Subtask B). In subtask A, each tweet in a corpus contained a marked instance of a word or phrase. The goal is to determine whether that instance is positive, negative or …
Content truncated to 500 words
Labeled Text
We present a sentiment classification system that participated in the SemEval 2014 shared task on sentiment analysis in Twitter. Our system expands tokens in a tweet with semantically similar expressions using a large novel distributional thesaurus and calculates the semantic relatedness of the expanded tweets to word lists representing positive and negative sentiment. This approach helps to assess the polarity of tweets that do not directly contain polarity cues. Moreover, we incorporate syntactic, lexical and surface sentiment features. On the message level, our system achieved the 8th place in terms of macroaveraged F-score among 50 systems, with particularly good performance on the LifeJournal corpus (F1=71.92) and the Twitter sarcasm (F1=54.59) dataset. On the expression level, our system ranked 14 out of 27 systems, based on macro-averaged F-score. 1
Publication Details
- Paper ID:
- 22705
- Year:
- 2014
- Publication:
- TIPSTER
- Publication Type:
- conf
- DOI:
- nan