TakeLab at SemEval-2017 Task 6: #RankingHumorIn4Pages
25307Authors
nan
Abstract
AbstractThis paper describes our system for humor ranking in tweets within the SemEval 2017 Task 6: #HashtagWars (6A and 6B). For both subtasks, we use an off-the-shelf gradient boosting model built on a rich set of features, handcrafted to provide the model with the external knowledge needed to better predict the humor in the text. The features capture various cultural references and specific humor patterns. Our system ranked 2nd (officially 7th) among 10 submissions on the Subtask A and 2nd among 9 submissions on the Subtask B.
Keywords
Full Content
Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval-2017), pages 396–400, Vancouver, Canada, August 3 - 4, 2017. c⃝2017 Association for Computational Linguistics TakeLab at SemEval-2017 Task 6: #RankingHumorIn4Pages Marin Kukovaˇcec, Juraj Malenica, Ivan Mrši´c, Antonio Šajatovi´c, Domagoj Alagi´c, Jan Šnajder Text Analysis and Knowledge Engineering Lab Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb Unska 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia {name.surname}@fer.hr Abstract This paper describes our system for hu- mor ranking in tweets within the SemEval 2017 Task 6: #HashtagWars (6A and 6B). For both subtasks, we use an off-the-shelf gradient boosting model built on a rich set of features, handcrafted to provide the model with the external knowledge needed to better predict the humor in the text. The features capture various cultural ref- erences and specific humor patterns. Our system ranked 2nd (officially 7th) among 10 submissions on the Subtask A and 2nd among 9 submissions on the Subtask B. 1 Introduction While extremely interesting, understanding humor expressed in text is a challenging natural language problem. Besides standard ambiguity of natu- ral language, humor is also highly subjective and lacks an universal definition (Mihalcea and Strap- parava, 2005). Moreover, humor should almost never be taken at face value, as its understanding often requires a broader context – external knowl- edge and common sense. On top of that, what is funny today might not be funny tomorrow, as hu- mor goes hand in hand with ever-changing trends of popular culture. Even though there has been some work on hu- mor generation (Petrovi´c and Matthews, 2013; Valitutti et al., 2013), most work has been con- cerned with humor detection, a task of classify- ing whether a given text snippet is humorous (Mi- halcea and Strapparava, 2005; Kiddon and Brun, 2011; Yang et al., 2015; Chen and Lee, 2017). However, this research was mostly focused on a simple binary detection of humor. In this paper, we describe a system for rank- ing humor in tweets, which we participated with in the SemEval-2017 Task 6 (Potash et al., 2017). It comprised two subtasks, one dealing with pre- dicting which tweet out of two is more humorous, and other with ranking a set of tweets by their humorousness. Even though these tasks can be both posed and tackled differently, we straightfor- wardly used the obtained pairwise classifications from the first task in coming up with ranked lists for the second. Our system uses a standard gra- dient boosting classifier (GB) based on a rich set of features and collections of external knowledge. We ranked 2nd among 10 submissions (7th offi- cially) at the Subtask 6A, and 2nd among 9 sub- missions at the Subtask 6B. 2 Task Description The dataset provided by the task organizers com- prises the tweets collected from many episodes of the Comedy Central show @midnight.1 This game show is based around contestants and view- ers providing humorous and witty tweets in re- sponse to a given topic (hashtag), which are then ranked by their humorousness. The compiled dataset …
Content truncated to 500 words
Labeled Text
AbstractThis paper describes our system for humor ranking in tweets within the SemEval 2017 Task 6: #HashtagWars (6A and 6B). For both subtasks, we use an off-the-shelf gradient boosting model built on a rich set of features, handcrafted to provide the model with the external knowledge needed to better predict the humor in the text. The features capture various cultural references and specific humor patterns. Our system ranked 2nd (officially 7th) among 10 submissions on the Subtask A and 2nd among 9 submissions on the Subtask B.
Publication Details
- Paper ID:
- 25307
- Year:
- 2017
- Publication:
- TIPSTER
- Publication Type:
- conf
- DOI:
- nan