Discourse-Related Language Contrasts in English-Croatian Human and Machine Translation

27852

Authors

nan

Abstract

AbstractWe present an analysis of a number of coreference phenomena in English-Croatian human and machine translations. The aim is to shed light on the differences in the way these structurally different languages make use of discourse information and provide insights for discourse-aware machine translation system development. The phenomena are automatically identified in parallel data using annotation produced by parsers and word alignment tools, enabling us to pinpoint patterns of interest in both languages. We make the analysis more fine-grained by including three corpora pertaining to three different registers. In a second step, we create a test set with the challenging linguistic constructions and use it to evaluate the performance of three MT systems. We show that both SMT and NMT systems struggle with handling these discourse phenomena, even though NMT tends to perform somewhat better than SMT. By providing an overview of patterns frequently occurring in actual language use, as well as by pointing out the weaknesses of current MT systems that commonly mistranslate them, we hope to contribute to the effort of resolving the issue of discourse phenomena in MT applications.

Keywords

nan

Full Content

Proceedings of the Third Conference on Machine Translation (WMT), Volume 1: Research Papers, pages 36–48 Belgium, Brussels, October 31 - Novermber 1, 2018. c⃝2018 Association for Computational Linguistics https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-64005 Discourse-Related Language Contrasts in English-Croatian Human and Machine Translation Margita Šoštari´c†∗ †University of Zagreb Dept. of English margita.sostaric1@ffzg.hr Christian Hardmeier∗ Sara Stymne∗ ∗Uppsala University Dept. of Linguistics and Philology first.last@lingfil.uu.se Abstract We present an analysis of a number of coref- erence phenomena in English-Croatian human and machine translations. The aim is to shed light on the differences in the way these struc- turally different languages make use of dis- course information and provide insights for discourse-aware machine translation system development. The phenomena are automati- cally identified in parallel data using annota- tion produced by parsers and word alignment tools, enabling us to pinpoint patterns of inter- est in both languages. We make the analysis more fine-grained by including three corpora pertaining to three different registers. In a sec- ond step, we create a test set with the challeng- ing linguistic constructions and use it to evalu- ate the performance of three MT systems. We show that both SMT and NMT systems strug- gle with handling these discourse phenomena, even though NMT tends to perform somewhat better than SMT. By providing an overview of patterns frequently occurring in actual lan- guage use, as well as by pointing out the weak- nesses of current MT systems that commonly mistranslate them, we hope to contribute to the effort of resolving the issue of discourse phe- nomena in MT applications. 1 Introduction Every natural language has means of marking ele- ments belonging to the same coreference chain in order to achieve cohesion and coherence in run- ning text. These discourse phenomena are crucial for understanding texts and their misrepresenta- tion harms text intelligibility. Despite their sig- nificance, machine translation (MT) systems have been known to struggle with adequately transfer- ring coreference relations from the source to the target language, which is partly due to the great differences in the way languages express these re- lations. In our approach, we extend the framework introduced by Lapshinova-Koltunski and Hard- meier (2017), who identify discourse discrepan- cies in parallel data for English and German by predefining and automatically extracting discourse patterns of interest, and then utilize word align- ment information to determine which of the ex- tracted phenomena lack the equivalent counterpart in the other language. We use the same procedure to automatically extract phenomena, but extend the methodology to include cases where the phe- nomenon does have an equivalent construction in the other language, despite the alignment data sug- gesting that it is more frequently left unaligned. In this research, we perform an in-depth study of the way in which diverse discourse phenomena are handled in translation from English to Croa- tian. We investigate both human translation and the output of different types of MT systems. In the first step, we use the extended methodology of Lapshinova-Koltunski and Hardmeier (2017) to extract interesting diverging discourse patterns that …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

AbstractWe present an analysis of a number of coreference phenomena in English-Croatian human and machine translations. The aim is to shed light on the differences in the way these structurally different languages make use of discourse information and provide insights for discourse-aware machine translation system development. The phenomena are automatically identified in parallel data using annotation produced by parsers and word alignment tools, enabling us to pinpoint patterns of interest in both languages. We make the analysis more fine-grained by including three corpora pertaining to three different registers. In a second step, we create a test set with the challenging linguistic constructions and use it to evaluate the performance of three MT systems. We show that both SMT and NMT systems struggle with handling these discourse phenomena, even though NMT tends to perform somewhat better than SMT. By providing an overview of patterns frequently occurring in actual language use, as well as by pointing out the weaknesses of current MT systems that commonly mistranslate them, we hope to contribute to the effort of resolving the issue of discourse phenomena in MT applications.

Publication Details

Paper ID:
27852
Year:
2018
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan