Combining Relational and Attributional Similarity for Semantic Relation Classification

29228

Authors

nan

Abstract

We combine relational and attributional similarity for the task of identifying instances of semantic relations, such as PRODUCT-PRODUCER and ORIGIN- ENTITY, between nominals in text. We use no pre-existing lexical resources, thus simulating a realistic real-world situation, where the coverage of any such resource is limited. Instead, we mine the Web to au- tomatically extract patterns (verbs, prepo- sitions and coordinating conjunctions) ex- pressing the relationship between the rela- tion arguments, as well as hypernyms and co-hyponyms of the arguments, which we use in instance-based classifiers. The eval- uation on the dataset of SemEval-1 Task 4 shows an improvement over the state-of- the-art for the case where using manually annotated WordNet senses is not allowed. 1

Keywords

nan

Full Content

Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, pages 323–330, Hissar, Bulgaria, 12-14 September 2011. Combining Relational and Attributional Similarity for Semantic Relation Classification Preslav Nakov Department of Computer Science National University of Singapore 13 Computing Drive Singapore 117417 nakov@comp.nus.edu.sg Zornitsa Kozareva University of Southern California Information Sciences Institute 4676 Admiralty Way Marina del Rey, CA 90292-6695, USA kozareva@isi.edu Abstract We combine relational and attributional similarity for the task of identifying instances of semantic relations, such as PRODUCT-PRODUCER and ORIGIN- ENTITY, between nominals in text. We use no pre-existing lexical resources, thus simulating a realistic real-world situation, where the coverage of any such resource is limited. Instead, we mine the Web to au- tomatically extract patterns (verbs, prepo- sitions and coordinating conjunctions) ex- pressing the relationship between the rela- tion arguments, as well as hypernyms and co-hyponyms of the arguments, which we use in instance-based classifiers. The eval- uation on the dataset of SemEval-1 Task 4 shows an improvement over the state-of- the-art for the case where using manually annotated WordNet senses is not allowed. 1 Introduction Recently, the natural language processing (NLP) community has shown renewed interest in the problem of deep language understanding, which was inspired by the notable progress in this impor- tant research direction in the last few years. To- day, lexical semantics tasks such as word sense disambiguation, semantic role labeling, and tex- tual entailment are already well-established and are gradually finding their way in real NLP ap- plications, while a number of new semantic tasks are emerging. One such example is the task of ex- tracting semantic relations between nominals from text, which has attracted a lot of research attention following the creation of two benchmark datasets as part of SemEval-1 Task 4 (Girju et al., 2007) and SemEval-2 Task 8 (Hendrickx et al., 2010). The ability to recognize semantic relations in text could potentially help many NLP applica- tions. For example, a question answering system facing the question What causes tumors to shrink? would need to identify the CAUSE-EFFECT rela- tion between shrinkage and radiation in order to be able to extract the answer from the following sentence: The period of tumor shrinkage after ra- diation therapy is often long and varied. One can also imagine a relational search engine that can serve queries such as “find all X such that X causes wrinkles”, asking for all entities that are in a particular relation with a given entity (Cafarella et al., 2006). Finally, modeling semantic relations has been shown to help statistical machine trans- lation (Nakov, 2008a). The task of identifying semantic relations in text is complicated by their heterogeneous nature. Thus, it is often addressed using non-parametric instance-based classifiers like the k nearest neigh- bors (kNN), which effectively reduce it to mea- suring the relational similarity between a testing and each of the training examples. The latter is studied in detail by Turney (2006), who distin- guishes between attributional similarity or corre- spondence between attributes, and relational sim- ilarity or correspondence between …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

We combine relational and attributional similarity for the task of identifying instances of semantic relations, such as PRODUCT-PRODUCER and ORIGINENTITY, between nominals in text. We use no pre-existing lexical resources, thus simulating a realistic real-world situation, where the coverage of any such resource is limited. Instead, we mine the Web to automatically extract patterns (verbs, prepositions and coordinating conjunctions) expressing the relationship between the relation arguments, as well as hypernyms and co-hyponyms of the arguments, which we use in instance-based classifiers. The evaluation on the dataset of SemEval-1 Task 4 shows an improvement over the state-ofthe-art for the case where using manually annotated WordNet senses is not allowed. 1

Publication Details

Paper ID:
29228
Year:
2011
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan