A Comparative Evaluation of Data-driven Models in Translation Selection of Machine Translation

6656

Authors

nan

Abstract

We present a comparative evaluation of two data-driven models used in translation selec- tion of English-Korean machine translation. La- tent semantic analysis(LSA) and probabilistic latent semantic analysis (PLSA) are applied for the purpose of implementation of data-driven models in particular. These models are able to represent complex semantic structures of given contexts, like text passages. Grammatical rela- tionships, stored in dictionaries, are utilized in translation selection essentially. We have used k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) learning to select an appropriate translation of the unseen instances in the dictionary. The distance of instances in k-NN is computed by estimating the similar- ity measured by LSA and PLSA. For experi- ments, we used TREC data(AP news in 1988) for constructing latent semantic spaces of two models and Wall Street Journal corpus for eval- uating the translation accuracy in each model. PLSA selected relatively more accurate transla- tions than LSA in the experiment, irrespective of the value of k and the types of grammatical relationship. 1

Keywords

nan

Full Content

A Comparative Evaluation of Data-driven Models in Translation Selection of Machine Translation ◦Yu-Seop Kim ⋆ Jeong-Ho Chang ⋆Byoung-Tak Zhang ◦ Ewha Institute of Science and Technology, Ewha Woman’s Univ. Seoul 120-750 Korea, yskim01@ewha.ac.kr∗ ⋆ Schools of Computer Science and Engineering, Seoul National Univ. Seoul 151-742 Korea, {jhchang, btzhang}@bi.snu.ac.kr† Abstract We present a comparative evaluation of two data-driven models used in translation selec- tion of English-Korean machine translation. La- tent semantic analysis(LSA) and probabilistic latent semantic analysis (PLSA) are applied for the purpose of implementation of data-driven models in particular. These models are able to represent complex semantic structures of given contexts, like text passages. Grammatical rela- tionships, stored in dictionaries, are utilized in translation selection essentially. We have used k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) learning to select an appropriate translation of the unseen instances in the dictionary. The distance of instances in k-NN is computed by estimating the similar- ity measured by LSA and PLSA. For experi- ments, we used TREC data(AP news in 1988) for constructing latent semantic spaces of two models and Wall Street Journal corpus for eval- uating the translation accuracy in each model. PLSA selected relatively more accurate transla- tions than LSA in the experiment, irrespective of the value of k and the types of grammatical relationship. 1 Introduction Construction of language associated resources like thesaurus, annotated corpora, machine- readable dictionary and etc. requires high de- gree of cost, since they need much of human- effort, which is also dependent heavily upon hu- man intuition. A data-driven model, however, does not demand any of human-knowledge, knowledge bases, semantic thesaurus, syntac- tic parser or the like. This model represents ∗ He is supported by Brain Korea 21 project performed by Ewha Institute of Science and Technology. † They are supported by Brain Tech. project controlled by Korean Ministry of Science and Technology. latent semantic structure of contexts like text passages. Latent semantic analysis (LSA) (Lan- dauer et al., 1998) and probabilistic latent se- mantic analysis (PLSA) (Hofmann, 2001) fall under the model. LSA is a theory and method for extracting and representing the contextual-usage meaning of words. This method has been mainly used for indexing and relevance estimation in infor- mation retrieval area (Deerwester et al., 1990). And LSA could be utilized to measure the co- herence of texts (Foltz et al., 1998). By applying the basic concept, a vector representation and a cosine computation, to estimate relevance of a word and/or a text and coherence of texts, we could also estimate the semantic similarity between words. It is claimed that LSA repre- sents words of similar meaning in similar ways (Landauer et al., 1998). Probabilistic LSA (PLSA) is based on proba- bilistic mixture decomposition while LSA is on a linear algebra and singular value decomposition (SVD) (Hofmann, 1999b). In contrast to LSA, PLSA’s probabilistic variant has a sound statis- tical foundation and defines a proper generative model of the data. Both two techniques have a same idea which is to map high-dimensional vectors representing text documents, to a …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

We present a comparative evaluation of two data-driven models used in translation selection of English-Korean machine translation. Latent semantic analysis(LSA) and probabilistic latent semantic analysis (PLSA) are applied for the purpose of implementation of data-driven models in particular. These models are able to represent complex semantic structures of given contexts, like text passages. Grammatical relationships, stored in dictionaries, are utilized in translation selection essentially. We have used k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) learning to select an appropriate translation of the unseen instances in the dictionary. The distance of instances in k-NN is computed by estimating the similarity measured by LSA and PLSA. For experiments, we used TREC data(AP news in 1988) for constructing latent semantic spaces of two models and Wall Street Journal corpus for evaluating the translation accuracy in each model. PLSA selected relatively more accurate translations than LSA in the experiment, irrespective of the value of k and the types of grammatical relationship. 1

Publication Details

Paper ID:
6656
Year:
2002
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan