A User Study of the Incremental Learning in NMT
2947Authors
nan
Abstract
AbstractIn the translation industry, human experts usually supervise and post-edit machine translation hypotheses. Adaptive neural machine translation systems, able to incrementally update the underlying models under an online learning regime, have been proven to be useful to improve the efficiency of this workflow. However, this incremental adaptation is somewhat unstable, and it may lead to undesirable side effects. One of them is the sporadic appearance of made-up words, as a byproduct of an erroneous application of subword segmentation techniques. In this work, we extend previous studies on on-the-fly adaptation of neural machine translation systems. We perform a user study involving professional, experienced post-editors, delving deeper on the aforementioned problems. Results show that adaptive systems were able to learn how to generate the correct translation for task-specific terms, resulting in an improvement of the user’s productivity. We also observed a close similitude, in terms of morphology, between made-up words and the words that were expected.
Keywords
Full Content
A User Study of the Incremental Learning in NMT Miguel Domingo1 and Mercedes García-Martínez2 and Álvaro Peris3 and Alexandre Helle2 and Amando Estela2 and Laurent Bié2 and Francisco Casacuberta1 and Manuel Herranz2 1PRHLT Research Center - Universitat Politècnica de València {midobal, fcn}@prhlt.upv.es 2Pangeanic / B.I Europa - PangeaMT Technologies Division {m.garcia, a.helle, a.estela, l.bie, m.herranz}@pangeanic.com 3Independent Researcher lvapeab@gmail.com Abstract In the translation industry, human experts usu- ally supervise and post-edit machine trans- lation hypotheses. Adaptive neural machine translation systems, able to incrementally up- date the underlying models under an online learning regime, have been proven to be use- ful to improve the efficiency of this workflow. However, this incremental adaptation is some- what unstable, and it may lead to undesirable side effects. One of them is the sporadic ap- pearance of made-up words, as a byproduct of an erroneous application of subword segmen- tation techniques. In this work, we extend pre- vious studies on on-the-fly adaptation of neu- ral machine translation systems. We perform a user study involving professional, experienced post-editors, delving deeper on the aforemen- tioned problems. Results show that adaptive systems were able to learn how to generate the correct translation for task-specific terms, re- sulting in an improvement of the user’s produc- tivity. We also observed a close similitude, in terms of morphology, between made-up words and the words that were expected. 1 Introduction Despite its improvements and obtaining admissible re- sults in many tasks, machine translation (MT) is still very far from obtaining automatic high-quality trans- lations (Dale, 2016; Toral et al., 2018). Thus, a hu- man agent needs to supervise and correct the outputs generated by an MT system. This process is known as post-editing and is a common use case of MT in the in- dustrial environment. As MT systems are continuously improving their capabilities, it has acquired major rele- vance in the translation market (Guerberof, 2008; Pym et al., 2012; Hu and Cadwell, 2016; Turovsky, 2016). Throughout the post-editing process, new data are continuously generated. These new data have valuable properties—they are domain-specific training samples. Thus, it can be leveraged to continuously adapt the sys- c⃝ 2020 The authors. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons 3.0 licence, no derivative works, attribution, CC- BY-ND. tem towards a given domain or the style of the post- editor. A common way of achieving this consists in following an online-learning paradigm (Ortiz-Martínez, 2016; Peris and Casacuberta, 2019). Each time the user validates a post-edit, the system’s models are up- dated incrementally with this new sample. Hence, when the system generates the next translation, it will con- sider the previous post-edits made by the user and it is expected to produce higher quality translations (or, at least, more suited to the post-editor’s preferences). Domingo et al. (2019b) conducted a preliminary user study for professional post-editors, who had a positive perception of the adaptive systems. However, they no- ticed that, in some cases, there were occurrences of some made-up words. In this work, we study the impact …
Content truncated to 500 words
Labeled Text
AbstractIn the translation industry, human experts usually supervise and post-edit machine translation hypotheses. Adaptive neural machine translation systems, able to incrementally update the underlying models under an online learning regime, have been proven to be useful to improve the efficiency of this workflow. However, this incremental adaptation is somewhat unstable, and it may lead to undesirable side effects. One of them is the sporadic appearance of made-up words, as a byproduct of an erroneous application of subword segmentation techniques. In this work, we extend previous studies on on-the-fly adaptation of neural machine translation systems. We perform a user study involving professional, experienced post-editors, delving deeper on the aforementioned problems. Results show that adaptive systems were able to learn how to generate the correct translation for task-specific terms, resulting in an improvement of the user’s productivity. We also observed a close similitude, in terms of morphology, between made-up words and the words that were expected.
Publication Details
- Paper ID:
- 2947
- Year:
- 2020
- Publication:
- TIPSTER
- Publication Type:
- conf
- DOI:
- nan