MABEL: Attenuating Gender Bias using Textual Entailment Data

30166

Authors

nan

Abstract

AbstractPre-trained language models encode undesirable social biases, which are further exacerbated in downstream use. To this end, we propose MABEL (a Method for Attenuating Gender Bias using Entailment Labels), an intermediate pre-training approach for mitigating gender bias in contextualized representations. Key to our approach is the use of a contrastive learning objective on counterfactually augmented, gender-balanced entailment pairs from natural language inference (NLI) datasets. We also introduce an alignment regularizer that pulls identical entailment pairs along opposite gender directions closer. We extensively evaluate our approach on intrinsic and extrinsic metrics, and show that MABEL outperforms previous task-agnostic debiasing approaches in terms of fairness. It also preserves task performance after fine-tuning on downstream tasks. Together, these findings demonstrate the suitability of NLI data as an effective means of bias mitigation, as opposed to only using unlabeled sentences in the literature. Finally, we identify that existing approaches often use evaluation settings that are insufficient or inconsistent. We make an effort to reproduce and compare previous methods, and call for unifying the evaluation settings across gender debiasing methods for better future comparison.

Keywords

nan

Full Content

Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 9681 - 9702 December 7-11, 2022 ©2022 Association for Computational Linguistics MABEL: Attenuating Gender Bias using Textual Entailment Data Jacqueline He∗ Mengzhou Xia Christiane Fellbaum Danqi Chen Department of Computer Science, Princeton University jacquelinehe00@gmail.com {mengzhou, fellbaum, danqic}@cs.princeton.edu Abstract Pre-trained language models encode undesir- able social biases, which are further exacer- bated in downstream use. To this end, we pro- pose MABEL (a Method for Attenuating Gen- der Bias using Entailment Labels), an interme- diate pre-training approach for mitigating gen- der bias in contextualized representations. Key to our approach is the use of a contrastive learn- ing objective on counterfactually augmented, gender-balanced entailment pairs from natural language inference (NLI) datasets. We also introduce an alignment regularizer that pulls identical entailment pairs along opposite gen- der directions closer. We extensively evaluate our approach on intrinsic and extrinsic metrics, and show that MABEL outperforms previous task-agnostic debiasing approaches in terms of fairness. It also preserves task performance af- ter fine-tuning on downstream tasks. Together, these findings demonstrate the suitability of NLI data as an effective means of bias mitiga- tion, as opposed to only using unlabeled sen- tences in the literature. Finally, we identify that existing approaches often use evaluation set- tings that are insufficient or inconsistent. We make an effort to reproduce and compare previ- ous methods, and call for unifying the evalua- tion settings across gender debiasing methods for better future comparison.1 1 Introduction Pre-trained language models have reshaped the landscape of modern natural language process- ing (Peters et al., 2018; Devlin et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2019). As these powerful networks are opti- mized to learn statistical properties from large train- ing corpora imbued with significant social biases (e.g., gender, racial), they produce encoded repre- sentations that inherit undesirable associations as a ∗This work was done before JH graduated from Princeton University. 1Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/ princeton-nlp/MABEL. byproduct (Zhao et al., 2019; Webster et al., 2020; Nadeem et al., 2021). More concerningly, models trained on these representations can not only prop- agate but also amplify discriminatory judgments in downstream applications (Kurita et al., 2019). A multitude of recent efforts have focused on alleviating biases in language models. These can be classed into two categories (Table 1): 1) task- specific approaches perform bias mitigation during downstream fine-tuning, and require data to be an- notated for sensitive attributes; 2) task-agnostic approaches directly improve pre-trained representa- tions, most commonly either by removing discrim- inative biases through projection (Dev et al., 2020; Liang et al., 2020; Kaneko and Bollegala, 2021), or by performing intermediate pre-training on gender- balanced data (Webster et al., 2020; Cheng et al., 2021; Lauscher et al., 2021; Guo et al., 2022), re- sulting in a new encoder that transfers fairness ef- fects downstream via standard fine-tuning. In this work, we present MABEL, a novel and lightweight method for attenuating gender bias. MABEL is task-agnostic and can be framed as an intermediate pre-training approach …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

AbstractPre-trained language models encode undesirable social biases, which are further exacerbated in downstream use. To this end, we propose MABEL (a Method for Attenuating Gender Bias using Entailment Labels), an intermediate pre-training approach for mitigating gender bias in contextualized representations. Key to our approach is the use of a contrastive learning objective on counterfactually augmented, gender-balanced entailment pairs from natural language inference (NLI) datasets. We also introduce an alignment regularizer that pulls identical entailment pairs along opposite gender directions closer. We extensively evaluate our approach on intrinsic and extrinsic metrics, and show that MABEL outperforms previous task-agnostic debiasing approaches in terms of fairness. It also preserves task performance after fine-tuning on downstream tasks. Together, these findings demonstrate the suitability of NLI data as an effective means of bias mitigation, as opposed to only using unlabeled sentences in the literature. Finally, we identify that existing approaches often use evaluation settings that are insufficient or inconsistent. We make an effort to reproduce and compare previous methods, and call for unifying the evaluation settings across gender debiasing methods for better future comparison.

Publication Details

Paper ID:
30166
Year:
2022
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan