JBLiMP: Japanese Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs

33334

Authors

nan

Abstract

AbstractIn this paper, we introduce JBLiMP (Japanese Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs), a novel dataset for targeted syntactic evaluations of language models in Japanese. JBLiMP consists of 331 minimal pairs, which are created based on acceptability judgments extracted from journal articles in theoretical linguistics. These minimal pairs are grouped into 11 categories, each covering a different linguistic phenomenon. JBLiMP is unique in that it successfully combines two important features independently observed in existing datasets: (i) coverage of complex linguistic phenomena (cf. CoLA) and (ii) presentation of sentences as minimal pairs (cf. BLiMP). In addition, JBLiMP is the first dataset for targeted syntactic evaluations of language models in Japanese, thus allowing the comparison of syntactic knowledge of language models across different languages. We then evaluate the syntactic knowledge of several language models on JBLiMP: GPT-2, LSTM, and n-gram language models. The results demonstrated that all the architectures achieved comparable overall accuracies around 75%. Error analyses by linguistic phenomenon further revealed that these language models successfully captured local dependencies like nominal structures, but not long-distance dependencies such as verbal agreement and binding.

Keywords

nan

Full Content

Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL 2023, pages 1581–1594 May 2-6, 2023 ©2023 Association for Computational Linguistics JBLiMP: Japanese Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs Taiga Someya and Yohei Oseki The University of Tokyo {taiga98-0809,oseki}@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp Abstract In this paper, we introduce JBLiMP (Japanese Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs), a novel dataset for targeted syntactic evaluations of language models in Japanese. JBLiMP consists of 331 minimal pairs, which are cre- ated based on acceptability judgments extracted from journal articles in theoretical linguistics. These minimal pairs are grouped into 11 cate- gories, each covering a different linguistic phe- nomenon. JBLiMP is unique in that it com- bines two important features independently ob- served in existing datasets: (i) coverage of com- plex linguistic phenomena (cf. CoLA) and (ii) presentation of sentences as minimal pairs (cf. BLiMP). In addition, JBLiMP is the first dataset for targeted syntactic evaluations of lan- guage models in Japanese, thus allowing the comparison of syntactic knowledge of language models across different languages. We then evaluate the syntactic knowledge of several lan- guage models on JBLiMP: GPT-2, LSTM, and n-gram language models. The results demon- strated that all the architectures achieved com- parable overall accuracies around 75%. Error analyses by linguistic phenomenon further re- vealed that these language models successfully captured local dependencies like nominal struc- tures, but not long-distance dependencies such as verbal agreement and binding. 1 Introduction The past few years have seen a remarkable suc- cess of neural language models, and some language models based on Transformer (Vaswani et al., 2017) have achieved the state-of-the-art performance in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks (Wang et al., 2018, 2019). In fact, recent neural lan- guage models are extremely successful in solving a variety of downstream tasks, but it remains to be understood how well these neural language mod- els understand the syntax of natural languages. In order to address this question, some studies investi- gated the syntactic knowledge of language models with a specially designed dataset for targeted syn- tactic evaluations (e.g., Linzen et al., 2016; Marvin and Linzen, 2018; Wilcox et al., 2018; Gulordava et al., 2018; Futrell et al., 2019; Chaves, 2020). However, most of these studies have focused on En- glish and other European languages, and only few studies extended this investigation to non-European languages (Gulordava et al., 2018; Ravfogel et al., 2018). Importantly for the purpose here, even fewer studies have dealt with a wide variety of linguistic phenomena in non-English languages (Xiang et al., 2021; Trotta et al., 2021). In this paper, we introduce JBLiMP (Japanese Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs), a novel dataset for targeted syntactic evaluations of lan- guage models in Japanese.1 JBLiMP consists of 331 minimal pairs, which are created based on ac- ceptability judgments extracted from journal ar- ticles in theoretical linguistics. These minimal pairs are grouped into 11 categories, each cover- ing a different linguistic phenomenon. JBLiMP is unique in that it successfully combines two important features independently observed in ex- isting datasets: (i) coverage of complex …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

AbstractIn this paper, we introduce JBLiMP (Japanese Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs), a novel dataset for targeted syntactic evaluations of language models in Japanese. JBLiMP consists of 331 minimal pairs, which are created based on acceptability judgments extracted from journal articles in theoretical linguistics. These minimal pairs are grouped into 11 categories, each covering a different linguistic phenomenon. JBLiMP is unique in that it successfully combines two important features independently observed in existing datasets: (i) coverage of complex linguistic phenomena (cf. CoLA) and (ii) presentation of sentences as minimal pairs (cf. BLiMP). In addition, JBLiMP is the first dataset for targeted syntactic evaluations of language models in Japanese, thus allowing the comparison of syntactic knowledge of language models across different languages. We then evaluate the syntactic knowledge of several language models on JBLiMP: GPT-2, LSTM, and n-gram language models. The results demonstrated that all the architectures achieved comparable overall accuracies around 75%. Error analyses by linguistic phenomenon further revealed that these language models successfully captured local dependencies like nominal structures, but not long-distance dependencies such as verbal agreement and binding.

Publication Details

Paper ID:
33334
Year:
2023
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan