STARC: Structured Annotations for Reading Comprehension

37460

Authors

nan

Abstract

AbstractWe present STARC (Structured Annotations for Reading Comprehension), a new annotation framework for assessing reading comprehension with multiple choice questions. Our framework introduces a principled structure for the answer choices and ties them to textual span annotations. The framework is implemented in OneStopQA, a new high-quality dataset for evaluation and analysis of reading comprehension in English. We use this dataset to demonstrate that STARC can be leveraged for a key new application for the development of SAT-like reading comprehension materials: automatic annotation quality probing via span ablation experiments. We further show that it enables in-depth analyses and comparisons between machine and human reading comprehension behavior, including error distributions and guessing ability. Our experiments also reveal that the standard multiple choice dataset in NLP, RACE, is limited in its ability to measure reading comprehension. 47% of its questions can be guessed by machines without accessing the passage, and 18% are unanimously judged by humans as not having a unique correct answer. OneStopQA provides an alternative test set for reading comprehension which alleviates these shortcomings and has a substantially higher human ceiling performance.

Keywords

nan

Full Content

Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 5726–5735 July 5 - 10, 2020. c⃝2020 Association for Computational Linguistics 5726 STARC: Structured Annotations for Reading Comprehension Yevgeni Berzak MIT BCS berzak@mit.edu Jonathan Malmaud MIT BCS malmaud@mit.edu Roger Levy MIT BCS rplevy@mit.edu Abstract We present STARC (Structured Annotations for Reading Comprehension), a new annota- tion framework for assessing reading compre- hension with multiple choice questions. Our framework introduces a principled structure for the answer choices and ties them to tex- tual span annotations. The framework is im- plemented in OneStopQA, a new high-quality dataset for evaluation and analysis of reading comprehension in English. We use this dataset to demonstrate that STARC can be leveraged for a key new application for the development of SAT-like reading comprehension materials: automatic annotation quality probing via span ablation experiments. We further show that it enables in-depth analyses and comparisons between machine and human reading compre- hension behavior, including error distributions and guessing ability. Our experiments also re- veal that the standard multiple choice dataset in NLP, RACE (Lai et al., 2017), is limited in its ability to measure reading comprehension. 47% of its questions can be guessed by ma- chines without accessing the passage, and 18% are unanimously judged by humans as not hav- ing a unique correct answer. OneStopQA pro- vides an alternative test set for reading compre- hension which alleviates these shortcomings and has a substantially higher human ceiling performance.1 1 Introduction Assessment of reading comprehension is of paramount importance in education and science and is a key component of high-stakes evaluations such as the SAT examinations. Reading compre- hension tasks are also central to NLP, where exten- sive efforts are invested in developing systems that try to match human-level performance. Despite 1OneStopQA dataset, STARC guidelines and human ex- periments data are available at https://github.com/ berzak/onestop-qa the proliferation of NLP work on reading compre- hension and the increasing number of large-scale reading comprehension datasets, key quality assur- ance issues such as question guessability, unwanted dataset biases, and the considerable success of sim- ple pattern matching and slot filling heuristics re- main open challenges for ensuring that evaluation benchmarks capture genuine reading comprehen- sion. Further, existing annotation frameworks have very limited support for reading behavior analyses which go beyond simple accuracy statistics. In this work, we introduce STARC, a new an- notation framework for multiple choice reading comprehension, which addresses these shortcom- ings. Our framework aims to ensure high anno- tation quality and supports detailed probing and comparisons of human and machine reading com- prehension behavior. The following are the primary novel characteristics of our annotation scheme. Structured Answer Choices As opposed to existing multiple choice reading comprehension datasets, our framework has a principled and consis- tent answer structure. Specifically, every question has four possible answers. The first answer is the correct answer. Importantly, the correct answer typ- ically does not appear verbatim in the passage. The second answer represents a misunderstanding of the critical information for answering the …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

AbstractWe present STARC (Structured Annotations for Reading Comprehension), a new annotation framework for assessing reading comprehension with multiple choice questions. Our framework introduces a principled structure for the answer choices and ties them to textual span annotations. The framework is implemented in OneStopQA, a new high-quality dataset for evaluation and analysis of reading comprehension in English. We use this dataset to demonstrate that STARC can be leveraged for a key new application for the development of SAT-like reading comprehension materials: automatic annotation quality probing via span ablation experiments. We further show that it enables in-depth analyses and comparisons between machine and human reading comprehension behavior, including error distributions and guessing ability. Our experiments also reveal that the standard multiple choice dataset in NLP, RACE, is limited in its ability to measure reading comprehension. 47% of its questions can be guessed by machines without accessing the passage, and 18% are unanimously judged by humans as not having a unique correct answer. OneStopQA provides an alternative test set for reading comprehension which alleviates these shortcomings and has a substantially higher human ceiling performance.

Publication Details

Paper ID:
37460
Year:
2020
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan