Document-level Sentiment Inference with Social, Faction, and Discourse Context
40566Authors
nan
Abstract
We present a new approach for document- level sentiment inference, where the goal is to predict directed opinions (who feels positively or negatively towards whom) for all entities mentioned in a text. To encour- age more complete and consistent predic- tions, we introduce an ILP that jointly models (1) sentence- and discourse-level sentiment cues, (2) factual evidence about entity factions, and (3) global constraints based on social science theories such as homophily, social balance, and reci- procity. Together, these cues allow for rich inference across groups of entities, includ- ing for example that CEOs and the com- panies they lead are likely to have simi- lar sentiment towards others. We evalu- ate performance on new, densely labeled data that provides supervision for all pairs, complementing previous work that only labeled pairs mentioned in the same sen- tence. Experiments demonstrate that the global model outperforms sentence-level baselines, by providing more coherent pre- dictions across sets of related entities. 1
Keywords
Full Content
Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 333–343, Berlin, Germany, August 7-12, 2016. c⃝2016 Association for Computational Linguistics Document-level Sentiment Inference with Social, Faction, and Discourse Context Eunsol Choi Hannah Rashkin Luke Zettlemoyer Yejin Choi Computer Science & Engineering University of Washington {eunsol,hrashkin,lsz,yejin}@cs.washington.edu Abstract We present a new approach for document- level sentiment inference, where the goal is to predict directed opinions (who feels positively or negatively towards whom) for all entities mentioned in a text. To encour- age more complete and consistent predic- tions, we introduce an ILP that jointly models (1) sentence- and discourse-level sentiment cues, (2) factual evidence about entity factions, and (3) global constraints based on social science theories such as homophily, social balance, and reci- procity. Together, these cues allow for rich inference across groups of entities, includ- ing for example that CEOs and the com- panies they lead are likely to have simi- lar sentiment towards others. We evalu- ate performance on new, densely labeled data that provides supervision for all pairs, complementing previous work that only labeled pairs mentioned in the same sen- tence. Experiments demonstrate that the global model outperforms sentence-level baselines, by providing more coherent pre- dictions across sets of related entities. 1 Introduction Documents often present a complex web of facts and opinions that hold among the entities they de- scribe. Consider the international relations story in Figure 1. Representatives from three countries form factions and create a network of sentiment. While some opinions are relatively directly stated (e.g., Russia criticizes Belarus), many others must be inferred based on the factual ties among enti- ties (e.g., Moscow, Gryzlov, and Russia probably share the same sentiment towards other entities) and known social context (e.g., Russia probably Russia criticized Belarus for permitting Georgian Presi- dent Mikheil Saakhashvili to appear on Belorussian tele- vision. “The appearance was an unfriendly step towards Russia,” the speaker of Russian parliament Boris Gry- zlov said. . . . Saakhashvili announced Thursday that he did not understand Russia’s claims. Moscow refused to have any business with Georgia’s president after the armed conflict in 2008 . . . Figure 1: Example text excerpt paired with the document- level sentiment graph we aim to recover. The graph includes edges with direct textual support (e.g., from Russian to Be- larus given the verb “criticized”) as well as ones that must be inferred at the whole-document level (e.g., from Gryzlov to Saakhashvili given the web of relationships and opinions between them, Georgia, Russian, and Belarus). dislikes Saakhashvili since Russia criticized Be- larus for supporting him). In this paper, we show that jointly reasoning about all of these factors can provide more complete and consistent document- level sentiment predictions. More concretely, we present a global model for document-level entity-to-entity sentiment, i.e., who feels positively (or negatively) towards whom. Our goal is to make exhaustive predictions over all entity pairs, including those that require cross- sentence inference. We present a Integer Lin- ear Programming (ILP) model that combines …
Content truncated to 500 words
Labeled Text
We present a new approach for documentlevel sentiment inference, where the goal is to predict directed opinions (who feels positively or negatively towards whom) for all entities mentioned in a text. To encourage more complete and consistent predictions, we introduce an ILP that jointly models (1) sentence- and discourse-level sentiment cues, (2) factual evidence about entity factions, and (3) global constraints based on social science theories such as homophily, social balance, and reciprocity. Together, these cues allow for rich inference across groups of entities, including for example that CEOs and the companies they lead are likely to have similar sentiment towards others. We evaluate performance on new, densely labeled data that provides supervision for all pairs, complementing previous work that only labeled pairs mentioned in the same sentence. Experiments demonstrate that the global model outperforms sentence-level baselines, by providing more coherent predictions across sets of related entities. 1
Publication Details
- Paper ID:
- 40566
- Year:
- 2016
- Publication:
- TIPSTER
- Publication Type:
- conf
- DOI:
- nan