Aspect-based summarization of pros and cons in unstructured product reviews

5331

Authors

nan

Abstract

AbstractWe developed three systems for generating pros and cons summaries of product reviews. Automating this task eases the writing of product reviews, and offers readers quick access to the most important information. We compared SynPat, a system based on syntactic phrases selected on the basis of valence scores, against a neural-network-based system trained to map bag-of-words representations of reviews directly to pros and cons, and the same neural system trained on clusters of word-embedding encodings of similar pros and cons. We evaluated the systems in two ways: first on held-out reviews with gold-standard pros and cons, and second by asking human annotators to rate the systems’ output on relevance and completeness. In the second evaluation, the gold-standard pros and cons were assessed along with the system output. We find that the human-generated summaries are not deemed as significantly more relevant or complete than the SynPat systems; the latter are scored higher than the human-generated summaries on a precision metric. The neural approaches yield a lower performance in the human assessment, and are outperformed by the baseline.

Keywords

nan

Full Content

Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 2219–2229 Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, August 20-26, 2018. 2219 Aspect-based summarization of pros and cons in unstructured product reviews Florian Kunneman Tilburg University PO Box 90153 5000LE Tilburg, The Netherlands f.a.kunneman@uvt.nl Sander Wubben Tilburg University PO Box 90153 5000LE Tilburg, The Netherlands s.wubben@uvt.nl Emiel Krahmer Tilburg University PO Box 90153 5000LE Tilburg, The Netherlands e.j.krahmer@uvt.nl Antal van den Bosch KNAW Meertens Institute Oudezijds Achterburgwal 185 1024DK Amsterdam, The Netherlands antal.van.den.bosch@meertens.knaw.nl Abstract We developed three systems for generating pros and cons summaries of product reviews. Au- tomating this task eases the writing of product reviews, and offers readers quick access to the most important information. We compared SynPat, a system based on syntactic phrases selected on the basis of valence scores, against a neural-network-based system trained to map bag-of- words representations of reviews directly to pros and cons, and the same neural system trained on clusters of word-embedding encodings of similar pros and cons. We evaluated the systems in two ways: first on held-out reviews with gold-standard pros and cons, and second by asking human annotators to rate the systems’ output on relevance and completeness. In the second eval- uation, the gold-standard pros and cons were assessed along with the system output. We find that the human-generated summaries are not deemed as significantly more relevant or complete than the SynPat systems; the latter are scored higher than the human-generated summaries on a precision metric. The neural approaches yield a lower performance in the human assessment, and are outperformed by the baseline. 1 Introduction Reviews posted on Web-based consumer platforms such as Amazon1 and Trustpilot2 form a valuable source of information prior to buying a product or hiring a service. Especially when a multitude of reviews of a specific product are gathered, the different experiences enable the consumer to obtain a well-informed conception of the qualities and deficiencies of the respective article. However, achieving a coherent view of a product tends to be challenging when a high volume of reviews diverge in focus and sentiment. A system that can summarize the reviews of a product would therefore be a valuable asset to these platforms. This work describes the implementation and evaluation of both a supervised and an unsupervised approach to aspect-based sentiment analysis, with a focus on Dutch product reviews of electric devices. We create summaries that zoom in on the pros and cons of the product that are mentioned in a re- view. Platforms that include product reviews commonly employ a pros and cons template to enable the authors of reviews themselves to summarize their review text. Although such a procedure could lead to This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. License details: http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 1https://www.amazon.com/ 2https://www.trustpilot.com/ 2220 appropriate summaries, only a minority of users make the effort to fill in the pros and cons.3 On the one hand, this behavior underlines the need for a tool to generate a summary when the writer chooses …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

AbstractWe developed three systems for generating pros and cons summaries of product reviews. Automating this task eases the writing of product reviews, and offers readers quick access to the most important information. We compared SynPat, a system based on syntactic phrases selected on the basis of valence scores, against a neural-network-based system trained to map bag-of-words representations of reviews directly to pros and cons, and the same neural system trained on clusters of word-embedding encodings of similar pros and cons. We evaluated the systems in two ways: first on held-out reviews with gold-standard pros and cons, and second by asking human annotators to rate the systems’ output on relevance and completeness. In the second evaluation, the gold-standard pros and cons were assessed along with the system output. We find that the human-generated summaries are not deemed as significantly more relevant or complete than the SynPat systems; the latter are scored higher than the human-generated summaries on a precision metric. The neural approaches yield a lower performance in the human assessment, and are outperformed by the baseline.

Publication Details

Paper ID:
5331
Year:
2018
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan