Chinese Word Ordering Errors Detection and Correction for Non-Native Chinese Language Learners
6018Authors
nan
Abstract
Word Ordering Errors (WOEs) are the most frequent type of grammatical errors at sentence level for non-native Chinese language learners. Learners taking Chinese as a foreign language often place character(s) in the wrong places in sentences, and that results in wrong word(s) or ungrammatical sentences. Besides, there are no clear word boundaries in Chinese sentences. That makes WOEs detection and correction more challenging. In this paper, we propose methods to detect and correct WOEs in Chinese sentences. Conditional random fields (CRFs) based WOEs detection models identify the sentence segments containing WOEs. Segment point-wise mutual information (PMI), inter-segment PMI difference, language model, tag of the previous segment, and CRF bigram template are explored. Words in the segments contain- ing WOEs are reordered to generate candidates that may have correct word orderings. Rank- ing SVM based models rank the candidates and suggests the most proper corrections. Train- ing and testing sets are selected from HSK dynamic composition corpus created by Beijing Language and Culture University. Besides the HSK WOE dataset, Google Chinese Web 5- gram corpus is used to learn features for WOEs detection and correction. The best model achieves an accuracy of 0.834 for detecting WOEs in sentence segments. On the average, the correct word orderings are ranked 4.8 among 184.48 candidates. 1
Keywords
Full Content
Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pages 279–289, Dublin, Ireland, August 23-29 2014. Chinese Word Ordering Errors Detection and Correction for Non-Native Chinese Language Learners Shuk-Man Cheng, Chi-Hsin Yu, Hsin-Hsi Chen Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan {smcheng,jsyu}@nlg.csie.ntu.edu.tw; hhchen@ntu.edu.tw Abstract Word Ordering Errors (WOEs) are the most frequent type of grammatical errors at sentence level for non-native Chinese language learners. Learners taking Chinese as a foreign language often place character(s) in the wrong places in sentences, and that results in wrong word(s) or ungrammatical sentences. Besides, there are no clear word boundaries in Chinese sentences. That makes WOEs detection and correction more challenging. In this paper, we propose methods to detect and correct WOEs in Chinese sentences. Conditional random fields (CRFs) based WOEs detection models identify the sentence segments containing WOEs. Segment point-wise mutual information (PMI), inter-segment PMI difference, language model, tag of the previous segment, and CRF bigram template are explored. Words in the segments contain- ing WOEs are reordered to generate candidates that may have correct word orderings. Rank- ing SVM based models rank the candidates and suggests the most proper corrections. Train- ing and testing sets are selected from HSK dynamic composition corpus created by Beijing Language and Culture University. Besides the HSK WOE dataset, Google Chinese Web 5- gram corpus is used to learn features for WOEs detection and correction. The best model achieves an accuracy of 0.834 for detecting WOEs in sentence segments. On the average, the correct word orderings are ranked 4.8 among 184.48 candidates. 1 Introduction Detection and correction of grammatical errors are practical for many applications such as document editing and language learning. Non-native language learners usually encounter problems in learning a new foreign language and are prone to generate ungrammatical sentences. Sentences with various types of errors are written by language learners of different backgrounds. In the HSK corpus, which contains compositions of students from different countries who study Chinese in Beijing Language and Culture University (http://nlp.blcu.edu.cn/online-systems/hsk-language-lib-indexing-system.html), there are 35,884 errors at sentence level. The top 10 error types and their occurrences are listed below: Word Ordering Errors (WOE) (8,515), Missing Component (Adverb) (3,244), Missing Component (Predicate) (3,018), Grammatical Error (“Is … DE”) (2,629), Missing Component (Subject) (2,405), Missing Component (Head Noun) (2364), Grammatical Error (“Is” sentence) (1,427), Redundant Component (Predicate) (1,130), Uncompleted Sentence (1,052), and Redundant Component (Adverb) (1,051). WOEs are the most frequent type of errors (Yu and Chen, 2012). The types of WOEs in Chinese are different from those in English. A Chinese character has its own meaning in text, while individual characters are meaningless in English. Learners taking Chinese as a foreign language often place character(s) in the wrong places in sentences, and that results in wrong word(s) or ungrammatical sentences. Besides, there are no clear word boundaries in Chinese sentences. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Page numbers and proceedings footer are added by the organisers. Licence …
Content truncated to 500 words
Labeled Text
Word Ordering Errors (WOEs) are the most frequent type of grammatical errors at sentence level for non-native Chinese language learners. Learners taking Chinese as a foreign language often place character(s) in the wrong places in sentences, and that results in wrong word(s) or ungrammatical sentences. Besides, there are no clear word boundaries in Chinese sentences. That makes WOEs detection and correction more challenging. In this paper, we propose methods to detect and correct WOEs in Chinese sentences. Conditional random fields (CRFs) based WOEs detection models identify the sentence segments containing WOEs. Segment point-wise mutual information (PMI), inter-segment PMI difference, language model, tag of the previous segment, and CRF bigram template are explored. Words in the segments containing WOEs are reordered to generate candidates that may have correct word orderings. Ranking SVM based models rank the candidates and suggests the most proper corrections. Training and testing sets are selected from HSK dynamic composition corpus created by Beijing Language and Culture University. Besides the HSK WOE dataset, Google Chinese Web 5gram corpus is used to learn features for WOEs detection and correction. The best model achieves an accuracy of 0.834 for detecting WOEs in sentence segments. On the average, the correct word orderings are ranked 4.8 among 184.48 candidates. 1
Publication Details
- Paper ID:
- 6018
- Year:
- 2014
- Publication:
- TIPSTER
- Publication Type:
- conf
- DOI:
- nan