Measuring the Effect of Discourse Relations on Blog Summarization
11976Authors
nan
Abstract
The work presented in this paper attempts to evaluate and quantify the use of dis- course relations in the context of blog summarization and compare their use to more traditional and factual texts. Specif- ically, we measured the usefulness of 6 discourse relations - namely compari- son, contingency, illustration, attribution, topic-opinion, and attributive for the task of text summarization from blogs. We have evaluated the effect of each relation using the TAC 2008 opinion summariza- tion dataset and compared them with the results with the DUC 2007 dataset. The re- sults show that in both textual genres, con- tingency, comparison, and illustration re- lations provide a significant improvement on summarization content; while attribu- tion, topic-opinion, and attributive rela- tions do not provide a consistent and sig- nificant improvement. These results indi- cate that, at least for summarization, dis- course relations are just as useful for in- formal and affective texts as for more tra- ditional news articles. 1
Keywords
Full Content
International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 1401–1409, Nagoya, Japan, 14-18 October 2013. Measuring the Effect of Discourse Relations on Blog Summarization Shamima Mithun Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada shamima.mithun@gmail.com Leila Kosseim Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada kosseim@encs.concordia.ca Abstract The work presented in this paper attempts to evaluate and quantify the use of dis- course relations in the context of blog summarization and compare their use to more traditional and factual texts. Specif- ically, we measured the usefulness of 6 discourse relations - namely compari- son, contingency, illustration, attribution, topic-opinion, and attributive for the task of text summarization from blogs. We have evaluated the effect of each relation using the TAC 2008 opinion summariza- tion dataset and compared them with the results with the DUC 2007 dataset. The re- sults show that in both textual genres, con- tingency, comparison, and illustration re- lations provide a significant improvement on summarization content; while attribu- tion, topic-opinion, and attributive rela- tions do not provide a consistent and sig- nificant improvement. These results indi- cate that, at least for summarization, dis- course relations are just as useful for in- formal and affective texts as for more tra- ditional news articles. 1 Introduction It is widely accepted that in a coherent text, units should not be understood in isolation but in rela- tion with each other through discourse relations that may or may not be explicitly marked. A text is not a linear combination of textual units but a hi- erarchial organized group of units placed together based on informational and intentional relations to one another. According to (Taboada, 2006), “Dis- course relations - relations that hold together dif- ferent parts (i.e. proposition, sentence, or para- graph) of the discourse - are partly responsible for the perceived coherence of a text”. For example, in the sentence “If you want the full Vista expe- rience, you’ll want a heavy system and graphics hardware, and lots of memory”, the first and sec- ond clauses do not bear much meaning indepen- dently; but become more meaningful when we re- alize that they are related through the discourse re- lation condition. Discourse relations have been found useful in many NLP applications such as natural language generation (e.g. (McKeown, 1985)) and news summarization (e.g. (Blair-Goldensohn and McK- eown, 2006; Bosma, 2004)) to improve coherence and better simulate human writing. However, most of these work have been developed for formal, well-written and factual documents. Text avail- able in the social media are typically written in a more casual style, are opinionated and speculative (Andreevskaia et al., 2007). Because of this, tech- niques developed for formal texts, such as news articles, often do not behave as well when deal- ing with informal documents. In particular, news articles are more uniform in style and structure; whereas blogs often do not exhibit a stereotypi- cal discourse structure. As a result, for blogs, it is usually more difficult to identify and rank rel- evant units for summarization compared to news articles. Several work have …
Content truncated to 500 words
Labeled Text
The work presented in this paper attempts to evaluate and quantify the use of discourse relations in the context of blog summarization and compare their use to more traditional and factual texts. Specifically, we measured the usefulness of 6 discourse relations - namely comparison, contingency, illustration, attribution, topic-opinion, and attributive for the task of text summarization from blogs. We have evaluated the effect of each relation using the TAC 2008 opinion summarization dataset and compared them with the results with the DUC 2007 dataset. The results show that in both textual genres, contingency, comparison, and illustration relations provide a significant improvement on summarization content; while attribution, topic-opinion, and attributive relations do not provide a consistent and significant improvement. These results indicate that, at least for summarization, discourse relations are just as useful for informal and affective texts as for more traditional news articles. 1
Publication Details
- Paper ID:
- 11976
- Year:
- 2013
- Publication:
- TIPSTER
- Publication Type:
- conf
- DOI:
- nan