Experimental Results for Baseline Speech Recognition Performance using Input Acquired from a Linear Microphone Array

12917

Authors

nan

Abstract

In this paper, baseline speech recognition performance is determined both for a single remote microphone and for a signal derived from a delay-and-sum beamformer using an eight-microphone linear array. An HMM-based, connected-speech, 38-word vocabulary (alphabet, digits, 'space', 'period'), talker-independent speech recognition system is used for testing performance. Normal performance, with no language model, i.e., raw word-level performance, is currently about 81% for a set of talkers not in the training set and about 91% for training set data. The system has been trained and tested using a close-talking bead-mounted microphone. Since a meaningful comparison requires using the same speech, the existing speech database was appropriately pre-filtered, played out through a transducer (speaker) in the room environment, picked-up by the microphone array, and re-stored as a digital file. The resulting file was post-processed and used as input to the recognizer; the recognition performance indicates the effect of the input device. The baseline experiment showed that both a single remote microphone and the beamformed signal reduced performance by 12% in a room with no other talkers. For the array tested, the error is generally attributable to reverberation off the floor and ceiling. 1.

Keywords

nan

Full Content

Experimental Results for Baseline Speech Recognition Performance using Input Acquired from a Linear Microphone Array Harvey F. Silverman, Smart E. Kirtman, John E. Adcock and Paul C. Meuse Laboratory for Engineering Man/Machine Systems (LEMS) ABSTRACT In this paper, baseline speech recognition performance is determined both for a single remote microphone and for a signal derived from a delay-and-sum beamformer using an eight-microphone linear array. An HMM-based, connected-speech, 38-word vocabulary (alphabet, digits, 'space', 'period'), talker-independent speech recognition system is used for testing performance. Normal performance, with no language model, i.e., raw word-level performance, is currently about 81% for a set of talkers not in the training set and about 91% for training set data. The system has been trained and tested using a close-talking bead-mounted microphone. Since a meaningful comparison requires using the same speech, the existing speech database was appropriately pre-filtered, played out through a transducer (speaker) in the room environment, picked-up by the microphone array, and re-stored as a digital file. The resulting file was post-processed and used as input to the recognizer; the recognition performance indicates the effect of the input device. The baseline experiment showed that both a single remote microphone and the beamformed signal reduced performance by 12% in a room with no other talkers. For the array tested, the error is generally attributable to reverberation off the floor and ceiling. 1. Introduction It is widely accepted that appropriate data-acquisition tech- nology must be available in order to make speech-recognition a viable computer input mode [1, 2, 3]. While work has been done in the area of signal conditioning [4], for the last three years, research at Brown University has been in progress to develop hardware, software and algorithms as a means to make non-intrusive speech acquisition a practical reality [5, 6] Principal focus to date has been to use the phase relationships among a group of microphones spaced in a line - hence a linear array - for the remote, real-time acquisition of a talker's data. Various beamforming and talker location/tracking algorithms have been studied, reported, and evaluated relative to listening quality [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12] The quality of a speech data acquisition system may be assessed in several ways. For many applications, evaluation is usually given, quantitatively, in terms of some signal- to-noise measure or human-listening experiment score, or qualitatively in terms of human evaluation. However, for a system whose output is fed to a speech recognizer, the *Supported principally by NSF/DARPA Grant No. IRI-8901882 Division of Engineering Brown University Providence, R102912 recognition performance is an excellent, quantifiable measure; this approach and its results make up the body of this paper. A key problem for such systems to overcome is that of rever- beration. Acoustic reflections in a normal room environment make the output of a remote microphone quite different from that taken from the normal, close-talking, recognizer micro- phone. Several ways have been suggested to alleviate this problem: • A more focused array system will attenuate reflections coming from a wider …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

In this paper, baseline speech recognition performance is determined both for a single remote microphone and for a signal derived from a delay-and-sum beamformer using an eight-microphone linear array. An HMM-based, connected-speech, 38-word vocabulary (alphabet, digits, 'space', 'period'), talker-independent speech recognition system is used for testing performance. Normal performance, with no language model, i.e., raw word-level performance, is currently about 81% for a set of talkers not in the training set and about 91% for training set data. The system has been trained and tested using a close-talking bead-mounted microphone. Since a meaningful comparison requires using the same speech, the existing speech database was appropriately pre-filtered, played out through a transducer (speaker) in the room environment, picked-up by the microphone array, and re-stored as a digital file. The resulting file was post-processed and used as input to the recognizer; the recognition performance indicates the effect of the input device. The baseline experiment showed that both a single remote microphone and the beamformed signal reduced performance by 12% in a room with no other talkers. For the array tested, the error is generally attributable to reverberation off the floor and ceiling. 1.

Publication Details

Paper ID:
12917
Year:
1992
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan