Hierarchic syntax improves reading time prediction
23036Authors
nan
Abstract
Previous work has debated whether humans make use of hierarchic syntax when process- ing language (Frank and Bod, 2011; Fos- sum and Levy, 2012). This paper uses an eye-tracking corpus to demonstrate that hier- archic syntax significantly improves reading time prediction over a strong n-gram baseline. This study shows that an interpolated 5-gram baseline can be made stronger by combining n-gram statistics over entire eye-tracking re- gions rather than simply using the last n-gram in each region, but basic hierarchic syntactic measures are still able to achieve significant improvements over this improved baseline. 1
Keywords
Full Content
Human Language Technologies: The 2015 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL, pages 1597–1605, Denver, Colorado, May 31 – June 5, 2015. c⃝2015 Association for Computational Linguistics Hierarchic syntax improves reading time prediction Marten van Schijndel William Schuler Department of Linguistics The Ohio State University {vanschm,schuler}@ling.osu.edu Abstract Previous work has debated whether humans make use of hierarchic syntax when process- ing language (Frank and Bod, 2011; Fos- sum and Levy, 2012). This paper uses an eye-tracking corpus to demonstrate that hier- archic syntax significantly improves reading time prediction over a strong n-gram baseline. This study shows that an interpolated 5-gram baseline can be made stronger by combining n-gram statistics over entire eye-tracking re- gions rather than simply using the last n-gram in each region, but basic hierarchic syntactic measures are still able to achieve significant improvements over this improved baseline. 1 Introduction In NLP, a concern exists that models of hierarchic syntax may be increasingly used exclusively to com- pensate for n-gram sparsity (Lease et al., 2006). In the context of psycholinguistic modeling, Frank and Bod (2011) find that hierarchic measures of syntac- tic processing are not as good at predicting reading times as sequential part-of-speech-based models of processing.1 Fossum and Levy (2012) follow up on this finding and show that, when better n-gram in- formation is present in the models, measures of hi- erarchic syntactic processing cost (PCFG surprisal; Hale, 2001; Levy, 2008) are as good at predicting reading times as the sequential models presented by Frank and Bod. 1Frank and Bod (2011) find that hierarchic measures signifi- cantly improve the descriptive linguistic accuracy of models but that such measures are unable to improve upon a strong linear baseline when predicting reading times. The present study builds on this finding by show- ing that cumulative n-gram probabilities signifi- cantly improve an n-gram baseline to better cap- ture sequential frequency statistics. Further, this study shows that measures of hierarchic structural frequencies (as captured by PCFG surprisal) signif- icantly improve reading time predictions over that improved sequential baseline. First, this work defines a stronger n-gram base- line than that used in previous studies by replacing a bigram baseline computed from 101 million words with an interpolated 5-gram baseline computed over 2.96 billion words. Second, while previous work has used n-grams from the end of each eye-movement region to model reading times in that region, this pa- per finds that such models can be significantly im- proved by combining n-gram statistics over the en- tire region (Section 3). Even when this improved baseline is combined with a standard n-gram base- line, this paper demonstrates that PCFG surprisal is a significant predictor of reading times (Section 4). This paper also applies region accumulation to total surprisal and finds that it is not significantly better than non-accumulated total surprisal. In fact, cumu- lative surprisal is shown not to be a significant pre- dictor of reading times at all when a cumulative n- gram factor is included in the baseline. Finally, this …
Content truncated to 500 words
Labeled Text
Previous work has debated whether humans make use of hierarchic syntax when processing language (Frank and Bod, 2011; Fossum and Levy, 2012). This paper uses an eye-tracking corpus to demonstrate that hierarchic syntax significantly improves reading time prediction over a strong n-gram baseline. This study shows that an interpolated 5-gram baseline can be made stronger by combining n-gram statistics over entire eye-tracking regions rather than simply using the last n-gram in each region, but basic hierarchic syntactic measures are still able to achieve significant improvements over this improved baseline. 1
Publication Details
- Paper ID:
- 23036
- Year:
- 2015
- Publication:
- TIPSTER
- Publication Type:
- conf
- DOI:
- nan