Multiplicative Tree-Structured Long Short-Term Memory Networks for Semantic Representations
24302Authors
nan
Abstract
AbstractTree-structured LSTMs have shown advantages in learning semantic representations by exploiting syntactic information. Most existing methods model tree structures by bottom-up combinations of constituent nodes using the same shared compositional function and often making use of input word information only. The inability to capture the richness of compositionality makes these models lack expressive power. In this paper, we propose multiplicative tree-structured LSTMs to tackle this problem. Our model makes use of not only word information but also relation information between words. It is more expressive, as different combination functions can be used for each child node. In addition to syntactic trees, we also investigate the use of Abstract Meaning Representation in tree-structured models, in order to incorporate both syntactic and semantic information from the sentence. Experimental results on common NLP tasks show the proposed models lead to better sentence representation and AMR brings benefits in complex tasks.
Keywords
Full Content
Proceedings of the 7th Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM), pages 276–286 New Orleans, June 5-6, 2018. c⃝2018 Association for Computational Linguistics Multiplicative Tree-Structured Long Short-Term Memory Networks for Semantic Representations Nam Khanh Tran∗ L3S Research Center ntran@l3s.de Weiwei Cheng Amazon weiweic@amazon.com Abstract Tree-structured LSTMs have shown advan- tages in learning semantic representations by exploiting syntactic information. Most exist- ing methods model tree structures by bottom- up combinations of constituent nodes using the same shared compositional function and often making use of input word information only. The inability to capture the richness of com- positionality makes these models lack expres- sive power. In this paper, we propose multi- plicative tree-structured LSTMs to tackle this problem. Our model makes use of not only word information but also relation information between words. It is more expressive, as dif- ferent combination functions can be used for each child node. In addition to syntactic trees, we also investigate the use of Abstract Mean- ing Representation in tree-structured models, in order to incorporate both syntactic and se- mantic information from the sentence. Experi- mental results on common NLP tasks show the proposed models lead to better sentence repre- sentation and AMR brings benefits in complex tasks. 1 Introduction Learning the distributed representation for long spans of text from its constituents has been a crucial step of various NLP tasks such as text classification (Zhao et al., 2015; Kim, 2014), se- mantic matching (Liu et al., 2016), and machine translation (Cho et al., 2014). Seminal work uses recurrent neural networks (RNN) (Elman, 1990), convolutional neural networks (Kalchbren- ner et al., 2014), and tree-structured neural net- works (Socher et al., 2011; Tai et al., 2015) for sequence and tree modeling. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) (Hochreiter and Schmidhuber, 1997) networks are a type of recurrent neural net- ∗ Work done as an intern at Amazon. 𝑐"#$ ℎ"#$ 𝑐" ℎ" 𝑥"#$ 𝑥" 𝑐"#$ ' ℎ"#$ ' 𝑐"#$ ( ℎ"#$ ( 𝑐" ℎ" 𝑥" 𝑥"#$ ' 𝑥"#$ ( (a) (b) Figure 1: Topology of sequential LSTM and TreeLSTM: (a) nodes in sequential LSTM and (b) nodes in tree-structured LSTM work that are capable of learning long-term de- pendencies across sequences and have achieved significant improvements in a variety of sequence tasks. LSTM has been extended to model tree structures (e.g., TreeLSTM) and produced promis- ing results in tasks such as sentiment classification (Tai et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2015) and relation ex- traction (Miwa and Bansal, 2016). Figure 1 shows the topologies of the con- ventional chain-structured LSTM (Hochreiter and Schmidhuber, 1997) and the TreeLSTM (Tai et al., 2015), illustrating the input (x), cell (c) and hid- den node (h) at a time step t. The key difference between Figure 1 (a) and (b) is the branching fac- tor. While a cell in the sequential LSTM only de- pends on the single previous hidden node, a cell in the tree-structured LSTM depends on the hidden states of child nodes. Despite their success, the tree-structured mod- els have …
Content truncated to 500 words
Labeled Text
AbstractTree-structured LSTMs have shown advantages in learning semantic representations by exploiting syntactic information. Most existing methods model tree structures by bottom-up combinations of constituent nodes using the same shared compositional function and often making use of input word information only. The inability to capture the richness of compositionality makes these models lack expressive power. In this paper, we propose multiplicative tree-structured LSTMs to tackle this problem. Our model makes use of not only word information but also relation information between words. It is more expressive, as different combination functions can be used for each child node. In addition to syntactic trees, we also investigate the use of Abstract Meaning Representation in tree-structured models, in order to incorporate both syntactic and semantic information from the sentence. Experimental results on common NLP tasks show the proposed models lead to better sentence representation and AMR brings benefits in complex tasks.
Publication Details
- Paper ID:
- 24302
- Year:
- 2018
- Publication:
- TIPSTER
- Publication Type:
- conf
- DOI:
- nan