Modelling Verbal Morphology in Nen

28495

Authors

nan

Abstract

AbstractNen verbal morphology is particularly complex; a transitive verb can take up to 1,740 unique forms. The combined effect of having a large combinatoric space and a low-resource setting amplifies the need for NLP tools. Nen morphology utilises distributed exponence - a non-trivial means of mapping form to meaning. In this paper, we attempt to model Nen verbal morphology using state-of-the-art machine learning models for morphological reinflection. We explore and categorise the types of errors these systems generate. Our results show sensitivity to training data composition; different distributions of verb type yield different accuracies (patterning with E-complexity). We also demonstrate the types of patterns that can be inferred from the training data, through the case study of sycretism.

Keywords

nan

Full Content

Modelling Verbal Morphology in Nen Saliha Murado˘gluΩΦ Nicholas EvansΩΦ Ekaterina Vylomovaµ ΩThe Australian National University (ANU) µThe University of Melbourne ΦARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language (CoEDL) saliha.muradgolu@anu.edu.au, nicholas.evans@anu.edu.au, ekaterina.vylomova@unimelb.edu.au Abstract Nen verbal morphology is remarkably com- plex; a transitive verb can take up to 1, 740 unique forms. The combined effect of having a large combinatoric space and a low-resource setting amplifies the need for NLP tools. Nen morphology utilises distributed exponence – a non-trivial means of mapping form to mean- ing. In this paper, we attempt to model Nen verbal morphology using state-of-the-art ma- chine learning models for morphological rein- flection. We explore and categorise the types of errors these systems generate. Our results show sensitivity to training data composition; different distributions of verb type yield differ- ent accuracies (patterning with E-complexity). We also demonstrate the types of patterns that can be inferred from the training data through the case study of syncretism. 1 Introduction A long-standing research direction in NLP targets the development of robust language technology applicable across the wide variety of the world’s languages. Unfortunately, the vast majority of ma- chine learning models are being developed for a small fraction of nearly 7,000 languages in the world, such as English, German, French, or Chi- nese. With introduction of highly multilingual corpora such as UniversalDependencies (Nivre et al., 2016) and UniMorph (Sylak-Glassman et al., 2015; Kirov et al., 2018) the situation started to change. For instance, SIGMORPHON organized a number of shared tasks on morphological reinflec- tion starting from 10 languages in 2016 (Cotterell et al., 2016) and up to 90 languages in 2020 (Vylo- mova et al., 2020). In 2020, languages were sam- pled from various typologically diverse families: Indo-European, Oto-Manguean, Tungusic, Turkic, Niger-Congo, Bantu, and others. Still, just one lan- guage, namely, Murrinh-patha, an Australian Abo- riginal language (Mansfield, 2019), represented the whole linguistic variety of the Oceania region. In this paper, we aim at filling the gap by exploring Nen, a Papuan language spoken by approximately 400 people in Papua New Guinea. Nen is known for its rich verbal morphology, with a transitive verb in- flecting for up to 1, 740 feature combinations. Dis- tributed exponence, the phenomenon which gives rise to this large paradigm size, provides insight into modelling complex mappings between surface forms and feature bundles. We conduct a series of experiments on morpho- logical reinflection task recently introduced under the umbrella of SIGMORPHON (Cotterell et al., 2016, 2018). We train several state-of-the-art ma- chine learning models for verbal inflection in Nen and provide an extensive error analysis. We inves- tigate the relationship between the distribution of verb type (inflection classes) in the data and per- formance. Finally, we show that the system learns properties of the data that are not explicitly given, but may be inferred. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, we give a brief overview of related work. Section 3 provides an overview of Nen verbal mor- phology, Section …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

AbstractNen verbal morphology is particularly complex; a transitive verb can take up to 1,740 unique forms. The combined effect of having a large combinatoric space and a low-resource setting amplifies the need for NLP tools. Nen morphology utilises distributed exponence - a non-trivial means of mapping form to meaning. In this paper, we attempt to model Nen verbal morphology using state-of-the-art machine learning models for morphological reinflection. We explore and categorise the types of errors these systems generate. Our results show sensitivity to training data composition; different distributions of verb type yield different accuracies (patterning with E-complexity). We also demonstrate the types of patterns that can be inferred from the training data, through the case study of sycretism.

Publication Details

Paper ID:
28495
Year:
2020
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan