Easy Victories and Uphill Battles in Coreference Resolution

34488

Authors

nan

Abstract

Classical coreference systems encode various syntactic, discourse, and semantic phenomena explicitly, using heterogenous features com- puted from hand-crafted heuristics. In con- trast, we present a state-of-the-art coreference system that captures such phenomena implic- itly, with a small number of homogeneous feature templates examining shallow proper- ties of mentions. Surprisingly, our features are actually more effective than the corre- sponding hand-engineered ones at modeling these key linguistic phenomena, allowing us to win “easy victories” without crafted heuris- tics. These features are successful on syntax and discourse; however, they do not model semantic compatibility well, nor do we see gains from experiments with shallow seman- tic features from the literature, suggesting that this approach to semantics is an “uphill bat- tle.” Nonetheless, our final system1 outper- forms the Stanford system (Lee et al. (2011), the winner of the CoNLL 2011 shared task) by 3.5% absolute on the CoNLL metric and outperforms the IMS system (Bj¨orkelund and Farkas (2012), the best publicly available En- glish coreference system) by 1.9% absolute. 1

Keywords

nan

Full Content

Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1971–1982, Seattle, Washington, USA, 18-21 October 2013. c⃝2013 Association for Computational Linguistics Easy Victories and Uphill Battles in Coreference Resolution Greg Durrett and Dan Klein Computer Science Division University of California, Berkeley {gdurrett,klein}@cs.berkeley.edu Abstract Classical coreference systems encode various syntactic, discourse, and semantic phenomena explicitly, using heterogenous features com- puted from hand-crafted heuristics. In con- trast, we present a state-of-the-art coreference system that captures such phenomena implic- itly, with a small number of homogeneous feature templates examining shallow proper- ties of mentions. Surprisingly, our features are actually more effective than the corre- sponding hand-engineered ones at modeling these key linguistic phenomena, allowing us to win “easy victories” without crafted heuris- tics. These features are successful on syntax and discourse; however, they do not model semantic compatibility well, nor do we see gains from experiments with shallow seman- tic features from the literature, suggesting that this approach to semantics is an “uphill bat- tle.” Nonetheless, our final system1 outper- forms the Stanford system (Lee et al. (2011), the winner of the CoNLL 2011 shared task) by 3.5% absolute on the CoNLL metric and outperforms the IMS system (Bj¨orkelund and Farkas (2012), the best publicly available En- glish coreference system) by 1.9% absolute. 1 Introduction Coreference resolution is a multi-faceted task: hu- mans resolve references by exploiting contextual and grammatical clues, as well as semantic infor- mation and world knowledge, so capturing each of 1The Berkeley Coreference Resolution System is available at http://nlp.cs.berkeley.edu. these will be necessary for an automatic system to fully solve the problem. Acknowledging this com- plexity, coreference systems, either learning-based (Bengtson and Roth, 2008; Stoyanov et al., 2010; Haghighi and Klein, 2010; Rahman and Ng, 2011b) or rule-based (Haghighi and Klein, 2009; Lee et al., 2011), draw on diverse information sources and complex heuristics to resolve pronouns, model dis- course, determine anaphoricity, and identify seman- tically compatible mentions. However, this leads to systems with many heterogenous parts that can be difficult to interpret or modify. We build a learning-based, mention-synchronous coreference system that aims to use the simplest pos- sible set of features to tackle the various aspects of coreference resolution. Though they arise from a small number of simple templates, our features are numerous, which works to our advantage: we can both implicitly model important linguistic ef- fects and capture other patterns in the data that are not easily teased out by hand. As a result, our data- driven, homogeneous feature set is able to achieve high performance despite only using surface-level document characteristics and shallow syntactic in- formation. We win “easy victories” without design- ing features and heuristics explicitly targeting par- ticular phenomena. Though our approach is successful at modeling syntax, we find semantics to be a much more chal- lenging aspect of coreference. Our base system uses only two recall-oriented features on nominal and proper mentions: head match and exact string match. Building on these features, we critically eval- uate several classes …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

Classical coreference systems encode various syntactic, discourse, and semantic phenomena explicitly, using heterogenous features computed from hand-crafted heuristics. In contrast, we present a state-of-the-art coreference system that captures such phenomena implicitly, with a small number of homogeneous feature templates examining shallow properties of mentions. Surprisingly, our features are actually more effective than the corresponding hand-engineered ones at modeling these key linguistic phenomena, allowing us to win “easy victories” without crafted heuristics. These features are successful on syntax and discourse; however, they do not model semantic compatibility well, nor do we see gains from experiments with shallow semantic features from the literature, suggesting that this approach to semantics is an “uphill battle.” Nonetheless, our final system1 outperforms the Stanford system (Lee et al. (2011), the winner of the CoNLL 2011 shared task) by 3.5% absolute on the CoNLL metric and outperforms the IMS system (Bj¨orkelund and Farkas (2012), the best publicly available English coreference system) by 1.9% absolute. 1

Publication Details

Paper ID:
34488
Year:
2013
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan