Noun Classification From Predicate-Argument Structures

NOUN CLASSIFICATION FROM PREDICATE.ARGUMENT STRUCTURES Donald Hindle AT&T Bell Laboratories 600 Mountain Avenue Murray Hill, NJ 07974 ABSTRACT A method of determining the similarity of nouns on the basis of a metric derived from the distribution of subject, verb and object in a large text corpus is described. The resulting quasi-semantic classification of nouns demonstrates the plausibility of the distributional hypothesis, and has potential application to a variety of tasks, including automatic indexing, resolving nominal compounds, and determining the scope of modification. 1. INTRODUCTION A variety of linguistic relations apply to sets of semantically similar words. For example, modifiers select semantically similar nouns, selecfional restrictions are expressed in terms of the semantic class of objects, and semantic type restricts the possibilities for noun compounding. Therefore, it is useful to have a classification of words into semantically similar sets. Standard approaches to classifying nouns, in terms of an "is-a" hierarchy, have proven hard to apply to unrestricted language. Is-a hierarchies are expensive to acquire by hand for anything but highly restricted domains, while attempts to automatically derive these hierarchies from existing dictionaries have been only partially successful (Chodorow, Byrd, and Heidom 1985). This paper describes an approach to classifying English words according to the predicate-argument structures they show in a corpus of text. The general idea is straightforward: in any natural language there ate restrictions on what words can appear together in the same construction, and in particular, on what can he arguments of what predicates. For nouns, there is a restricted set of verbs that it appears as subject of or object of. For example, wine may be drunk, produced, and sold but not pruned. Each noun may therefore he characterized according to the verbs that it occurs with. Nouns may then he grouped according to the extent to which they appear in similar environments. This basic idea of the distributional foundation of meaning is not new. Hams (1968) makes this "distributional hypothesis" central to his linguistic theory. His claim is that: "the meaning of entities, and the meaning of grammatical relations among them, is related to the restriction of combinations of these entities relative to other entities." (Harris 1968:12). Sparck Jones (1986) takes a similar view. It is however by no means obvious that the distribution of words will directly provide a useful semantic classification, at least in the absence of considerable human intervention. The work that has been done based on Harris' distributional hypothesis (most notably, the work of the associates of the Linguistic String Project (see for example, Hirschman, Grishman, and Sager 1975)) unfortunately does not provide a direct answer, since the corpora used have been small (tens of thousands of words rather than millions) and the analysis has typically involved considerable intervention by the researchers. The stumbling block to any automatic use of distributional patterns has been that no sufficiently robust syntactic analyzer has been available. This paper reports an investigation of automatic distributional classification of words in English, using a parser developed for extracting grammatical …

Content truncated to 500 words