Predicting the relevance of distributional semantic similarity with contextual information

40603

Authors

nan

Abstract

Using distributional analysis methods to compute semantic proximity links be- tween words has become commonplace in NLP. The resulting relations are often noisy or difficult to interpret in general. This paper focuses on the issues of eval- uating a distributional resource and filter- ing the relations it contains, but instead of considering it in abstracto, we focus on pairs of words in context. In a dis- course, we are interested in knowing if the semantic link between two items is a by- product of textual coherence or is irrele- vant. We first set up a human annotation of semantic links with or without contex- tual information to show the importance of the textual context in evaluating the rele- vance of semantic similarity, and to assess the prevalence of actual semantic relations between word tokens. We then built an ex- periment to automatically predict this rel- evance, evaluated on the reliable reference data set which was the outcome of the first annotation. We show that in-document in- formation greatly improve the prediction made by the similarity level alone. 1

Keywords

nan

Full Content

Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 479–488, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, June 23-25 2014. c⃝2014 Association for Computational Linguistics Predicting the relevance of distributional semantic similarity with contextual information Philippe Muller IRIT, Toulouse University Universit´e Paul Sabatier 118 Route de Narbonne 31062 Toulouse Cedex 04 philippe.muller@irit.fr C´ecile Fabre CLLE, Toulouse University Universit´e Toulouse-Le Mirail 5 alles A. Machado 31058 Toulouse Cedex cecile.fabre@univ-tlse2.fr Cl´ementine Adam CLLE, Toulouse University Universit´e Toulouse-Le Mirail 5 alles A. Machado 31058 Toulouse Cedex clementine.adam@univ-tlse2.fr Abstract Using distributional analysis methods to compute semantic proximity links be- tween words has become commonplace in NLP. The resulting relations are often noisy or difficult to interpret in general. This paper focuses on the issues of eval- uating a distributional resource and filter- ing the relations it contains, but instead of considering it in abstracto, we focus on pairs of words in context. In a dis- course, we are interested in knowing if the semantic link between two items is a by- product of textual coherence or is irrele- vant. We first set up a human annotation of semantic links with or without contex- tual information to show the importance of the textual context in evaluating the rele- vance of semantic similarity, and to assess the prevalence of actual semantic relations between word tokens. We then built an ex- periment to automatically predict this rel- evance, evaluated on the reliable reference data set which was the outcome of the first annotation. We show that in-document in- formation greatly improve the prediction made by the similarity level alone. 1 Introduction The goal of the work presented in this paper is to improve distributional thesauri, and to help evalu- ate the content of such resources. A distributional thesaurus is a lexical network that lists semantic neighbours, computed from a corpus and a simi- larity measure between lexical items, which gen- erally captures the similarity of contexts in which the items occur. This way of building a seman- tic network has been very popular since (Grefen- stette, 1994; Lin, 1998), even though the nature of the information it contains is hard to define, and its evaluation is far from obvious. A distributional thesaurus includes a lot of “noise” from a seman- tic point of view, but also lists relevant lexical pairs that escape classical lexical relations such as syn- onymy or hypernymy. There is a classical dichotomy when evaluat- ing NLP components between extrinsic and in- trinsic evaluations (Jones, 1994), and this applies to distributional thesauri (Curran, 2004; Poibeau and Messiant, 2008). Extrinsic evaluations mea- sure the capacity of a system in which a resource or a component to evaluate has been used, for in- stance in this case information retrieval (van der Plas, 2008) or word sense disambiguation (Weeds and Weir, 2005). Intrinsic evaluations try to mea- sure the resource itself with respect to some hu- man standard or judgment, for instance by com- paring a distributional resource with respect to an existing synonym dictionary or similarity …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

Using distributional analysis methods to compute semantic proximity links between words has become commonplace in NLP. The resulting relations are often noisy or difficult to interpret in general. This paper focuses on the issues of evaluating a distributional resource and filtering the relations it contains, but instead of considering it in abstracto, we focus on pairs of words in context. In a discourse, we are interested in knowing if the semantic link between two items is a byproduct of textual coherence or is irrelevant. We first set up a human annotation of semantic links with or without contextual information to show the importance of the textual context in evaluating the relevance of semantic similarity, and to assess the prevalence of actual semantic relations between word tokens. We then built an experiment to automatically predict this relevance, evaluated on the reliable reference data set which was the outcome of the first annotation. We show that in-document information greatly improve the prediction made by the similarity level alone. 1

Publication Details

Paper ID:
40603
Year:
2014
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan