Semantic Overlap Summarization among Multiple Alternative Narratives: An Exploratory Study

4681

Authors

nan

Abstract

AbstractIn this paper, we introduce an important yet relatively unexplored NLP task called Semantic Overlap Summarization (SOS), which entails generating a single summary from multiple alternative narratives which can convey the common information provided by those narratives. As no benchmark dataset is readily available for this task, we created one by collecting 2,925 alternative narrative pairs from the web and then, went through the tedious process of manually creating 411 different reference summaries by engaging human annotators. As a way to evaluate this novel task, we first conducted a systematic study by borrowing the popular ROUGE metric from text-summarization literature and discovered that ROUGE is not suitable for our task. Subsequently, we conducted further human annotations to create 200 document-level and 1,518 sentence-level ground-truth overlap labels. Our experiments show that the sentence-wise annotation technique with three overlap labels, i.e., Absent (A), Partially-Present (PP), and Present (P), yields a higher correlation with human judgment and higher inter-rater agreement compared to the ROUGE metric.

Keywords

nan

Full Content

Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 6195–6207 October 12–17, 2022. 6195 Semantic Overlap Summarization among Multiple Alternative Narratives: an Exploratory Study Naman Bansal, Mousumi Akter and Shubhra Kanti Karmaker (“Santu”) Big Data Intelligence (BDI) Lab Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering College of Engineering, Auburn University {nbansal, mza0170, sks0086}@auburn.edu Abstract In this paper, we introduce an important yet rel- atively unexplored NLP task called Semantic Overlap Summarization (SOS), which entails generating a single summary from multiple al- ternative narratives which can convey the com- mon information provided by those narratives. As no benchmark dataset is readily available for this task, we created one by collecting 2, 925 al- ternative narrative pairs from the web and then, went through the tedious process of manually creating 411 different reference summaries by engaging human annotators. As a way to evalu- ate this novel task, we first conducted a system- atic study by borrowing the popular ROUGE metric from text-summarization literature and discovered that ROUGE is not suitable for our task. Subsequently, we conducted further hu- man annotations to create 200 document-level and 1, 518 sentence-level ground-truth overlap labels. Our experiments show that the sentence- wise annotation technique with three overlap labels, i.e., {Absent (A), Partially-Present (PP), and Present (P)}, yields a higher correlation with human judgment and higher inter-rater agreement compared to the ROUGE metric. 1 Introduction In this paper, we look deeper into the challeng- ing yet relatively under-explored area of automatic summarization of multiple alternative narratives with different perspectives. To be more specific, we formally introduce a new NLP task called Semantic Overlap Summarization (SOS) from multiple alter- native narratives and conduct a systematic study of this task by creating a benchmark dataset as well as exploring how to accurately evaluate this task. SOS essentially means the task of summarizing the overlapping information present in multiple alter- nate narratives by cross-verifying their information contents against each other. Computationally, our research question is the following: Given two distinct narratives N1 and N2 of an event e, how can we automatically generate a sin- gle summary about e which conveys the common information provided by both N1 and N2? Multiple alternative narratives appear frequently in a variety of domains, including education (So- masundaran et al., 2018), the health sector (Bijoy et al., 2021), businesses intelligence (Azeroual and Theel, 2018), content analysis (Hassan et al., 2020; Karmaker Santu et al., 2018b) and privacy (Wil- son et al., 2018). Therefore, automatic summariza- tion of multiple-perspective narratives has become a pressing need in this information explosion era and can be highly useful for digesting such multi- narratives at scale and speed. Figure 1 shows a toy example of the SOS task, where both articles cover the same event related to “abortion”. However, they report from different po- litical perspectives, i.e., one from the left wing and the other from the right wing. For greater visibility, “Left” and “Right” wing reporting biases are rep- resented by blue and red text, respectively. Green …

Content truncated to 500 words

Labeled Text

AbstractIn this paper, we introduce an important yet relatively unexplored NLP task called Semantic Overlap Summarization (SOS), which entails generating a single summary from multiple alternative narratives which can convey the common information provided by those narratives. As no benchmark dataset is readily available for this task, we created one by collecting 2,925 alternative narrative pairs from the web and then, went through the tedious process of manually creating 411 different reference summaries by engaging human annotators. As a way to evaluate this novel task, we first conducted a systematic study by borrowing the popular ROUGE metric from text-summarization literature and discovered that ROUGE is not suitable for our task. Subsequently, we conducted further human annotations to create 200 document-level and 1,518 sentence-level ground-truth overlap labels. Our experiments show that the sentence-wise annotation technique with three overlap labels, i.e., Absent (A), Partially-Present (PP), and Present (P), yields a higher correlation with human judgment and higher inter-rater agreement compared to the ROUGE metric.

Publication Details

Paper ID:
4681
Year:
2022
Publication:
TIPSTER
Publication Type:
conf
DOI:
nan