material ID: xsum

Related Papers

Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summaries

Authors: nan

Publication: TIPSTER (2020)

DOI: nan

AbstractPractical applications of abstractive summarization models are limited by frequent factual inconsistencies with respect to their input. Existing automatic evaluation metrics for summarization are largely insensitive to such errors. We …...

37549

A Well-Composed Text is Half Done! Composition Sampling for Diverse Conditional Generation

Authors: nan

Publication: TIPSTER (2022)

DOI: nan

AbstractWe propose Composition Sampling, a simple but effective method to generate diverse outputs for conditional generation of higher quality compared to previous stochastic decoding strategies. It builds on recently proposed …...

39282

Abstractive Summarization Guided by Latent Hierarchical Document Structure

Authors: nan

Publication: TIPSTER (2022)

DOI: nan

AbstractSequential abstractive neural summarizers often do not use the underlying structure in the input article or dependencies between the input sentences. This structure is essential to integrate and consolidate information …...

30797

Correcting Diverse Factual Errors in Abstractive Summarization via Post-Editing and Language Model Infilling

Authors: nan

Publication: TIPSTER (2022)

DOI: nan

AbstractAbstractive summarization models often generate inconsistent summaries containing factual errors or hallucinated content. Recent works focus on correcting factual errors in generated summaries via post-editing. Such correction models are trained …...

30135

HydraSum: Disentangling Style Features in Text Summarization with Multi-Decoder Models

Authors: nan

Publication: TIPSTER (2022)

DOI: nan

AbstractSummarization systems make numerous “decisions” about summary properties during inference, e.g. degree of copying, specificity and length of outputs, etc. However, these are implicitly encoded within model parameters and specific …...

31604

Improving Factual Consistency in Summarization with Compression-Based Post-Editing

Authors: nan

Publication: TIPSTER (2022)

DOI: nan

AbstractState-of-the-art summarization models still struggle to be factually consistent with the input text. A model-agnostic way to address this problem is post-editing the generated summaries. However, existing approaches typically fail …...

30231

SummaReranker: A Multi-Task Mixture-of-Experts Re-ranking Framework for Abstractive Summarization

Authors: nan

Publication: TIPSTER (2022)

DOI: nan

AbstractSequence-to-sequence neural networks have recently achieved great success in abstractive summarization, especially through fine-tuning large pre-trained language models on the downstream dataset. These models are typically decoded with beam search …...

39070

Training Dynamics for Text Summarization Models

Authors: nan

Publication: TIPSTER (2022)

DOI: nan

AbstractPre-trained language models (e.g. BART) have shown impressive results when fine-tuned on large summarization datasets. However, little is understood about this fine-tuning process, including what knowledge is retained from pre-training …...

32687

Generating EDU Extracts for Plan-Guided Summary Re-Ranking

Authors: nan

Publication: TIPSTER (2023)

DOI: nan

AbstractTwo-step approaches, in which summary candidates are generated-then-reranked to return a single summary, can improve ROUGE scores over the standard single-step approach. Yet, standard decoding methods (i.e., beam search, nucleus …...

38707

Multi-View Source Ablation for Faithful Summarization

Authors: nan

Publication: TIPSTER (2023)

DOI: nan

AbstractIn this paper, we present MuFaSSa (Multi-view Faithfulness Scoring via Source Ablation), a metric for evaluating faithfulness of abstractive summaries, and for guiding training of more faithful summarizers. For evaluation, …...

33304